IÉSEG School of Management vs Sciences Po vs Université de Poitiers vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 538 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Approachable, invested, and knowledgeable faculty
- +Stimulating and supportive academic environment
- +Clean, comfortable, and well-maintained facilities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
- +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
- +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
- +High-quality teaching from professors and speakers
- +International environment and student diversity
- +Practical curriculum and preparation for professional challenges
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Strong aerospace focus with practical application.
- +Vibrant student life and numerous associations.
- +Good balance of theory and practice.
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Poor management and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance.
- -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
- -Superficial academic content lacking depth and practical value
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient internship/apprenticeship support
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or desired specializations
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
This institution shows a generally positive reception across its evaluated aspects. Student life stands out as a particular strength, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, location and value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Facilities and accommodation are also well-regarded, with professors and internationality performing strongly.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Internationality, closely followed by Student Life and Location, all receiving high scores above 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest category, with the lowest rating of 3.61. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating areas of consistent, good performance.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution receives its highest accolades for student life and facilities, both scoring well above average. Conversely, the location emerges as a significant concern, with a considerably lower rating. Other areas like professors, accommodation, and value present a more moderate, positive picture, while internationality falls somewhere in the middle.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 16 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise approachable and invested teachers, quality lessons, and a clean, comfortable study environment.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.
Most reviews are positive (~86%), praising teaching quality, cultural diversity, and modern infrastructure. A small number (~5%) mention superficial subject coverage or lack of practical value.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Students praise extensive practical aerospace training and vibrant student life with numerous associations. The university's isolated location is a recurring concern, though positive feedback suggests it doesn't overshadow the strong sense of community.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
