Universidad Europea - UE vs NOVA Information Management School - NOVA IMS vs Nova School of Business and Economics vs Catholic Lisbon School of Business and Economics vs Universidade Lusófona
Side-by-side comparison from 358 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Modern teaching methods and well-equipped facilities
- +Strong focus on practical learning and career opportunities
- +Supportive faculty and enriching academic environment
- +High-quality, accomplished professors
- +Relevant, practical skills for future careers
- +Supportive, international learning environment
- +Strong academic programs with valuable knowledge for future careers.
- +Wonderful campus and vibrant community with many extracurricular activities.
- +Competent and friendly professors and high-quality resources.
- +Challenging academics and high expectations.
- +Knowledgeable and supportive faculty.
- +Flexible programs and career-focused education.
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Positive campus atmosphere and facilities
- +International and diverse community
- +Interactive and engaging learning approach
- +Focus on personal growth and development
- +Challenging yet achievable academic programs
- +Enthusiastic and passionate professors
- +Conducive learning environment and good facilities
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful staff.
- -Lack of teacher engagement and support.
- -Financial policies and material costs.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause student problems.
- -Lack of student support is a recurring complaint.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues, including course cancellations and exam scheduling problems.
- -Overcrowding due to excessive student intake, leading to a lack of study spaces.
- -Outdated and theoretical course content, lacking practical and market-driven skills.
- -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance significantly detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of student support and engagement opportunities are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and communication issues
- -Poor teaching quality and grading
- -Outdated facilities
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources.
- -Limited career support and unclear future prospects.
This university garners high marks for its internationality, achieving a rating of 4.49. Professors are also well-regarded at 4.21, closely followed by facilities at 4.23 and student life at 4.04. Conversely, accommodation and value received lower scores, at 3.79 and 3.72 respectively, while location sits at 3.98.
This institution receives commendations for its strong performance in several areas, particularly Location, which scored highest, and Professors and Internationality, also rated very favorably. Student Life and Value also reflect positive student experiences. However, Accomodation received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement, while Facilities are rated moderately.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with its **Facilities** standing out as the strongest area at 4.65. **Professors** and **Internationality** also garnered high marks. **Accomodation** is noted as the weakest aspect, scoring 3.72, while **Student Life** and **Location** fall within a solid mid-range. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and academic staff.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors**, earning a high rating, and also scores well in **Location** and **Internationality**. While **Student Life** and **Facilities** are generally positive, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university also offers good **Value**, reflecting a well-rounded profile with specific areas for potential enhancement.
Overall, the institution receives a mixed but generally positive rating. Location stands out as the strongest aspect, achieving a perfect score. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Internationality and value for money are areas where improvement could be beneficial, as they receive the same middling score.
Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.
This institution receives strong evaluations across most categories, with particularly high marks for Professors, Location, and Internationality, all scoring above 4.45. Student Life and Value are also well-regarded, averaging 4.36. Facilities are rated at 4.27. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a score of 3.55.
Most reviews are positive (~96%), highlighting modern teaching methods, practical learning, and job opportunities. A small minority of feedback (~4%) mentions indifferent teachers and material costs.
Most students have a very positive experience, praising professors, practical applications, and the international environment. Of the 25 reviews, 23 are positive (4-5 stars). A small number of reviews mention issues with institutional procedures and student support.
With a 4.49 average rating from 196 reviews, most students praise the strong community, nature-oriented campus, and opportunities for personal and professional growth through clubs and events. A small percentage of feedback (~2.6%) mentions organizational issues and a perceived lack of practical job market preparation.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 from 21 reviews, ~95% are positive. Students highlight excellent academic rigor, outstanding teaching quality with knowledgeable and supportive professors, and a strong learning environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews are positive, highlighting a dynamic campus atmosphere, engaging classes, and helpful teachers. A small portion of negative feedback mentions issues with international student support and outdated facilities.
With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.55/5, students praise challenging yet achievable coursework and excellent faculty passion. The campus environment, facilities, and suitability for academic excellence are also frequently highlighted.
Excellent university, with experienced professors, professionals in the areas they teach and with an incomparable teacher-student proximity.It is a very good university for International students since thet offer Portuguese classes and some subjects are in English. In terms of infrastructure, despite being small and not having all the conditions and equipment, it brings together a pleasant environment for studying - in addition to very good cleaning conditions and modern rooms. At the administrative level, it is organized. As for the students, many are very interested in being there, excellent students and enormous dedication.
It is a good university to combine two main areas, management and technology. It has international teachers and the conditions are being improved in last few years. The Campus is also very well located.
I believe Nova SBE offers many unique extra-curricular opportunities. For example, through this university, I have already secured two internships that allowed me to explore my future career paths. I also joined a student-led no-proft organization, Noma Consulting, which allowed me to work on a real-life consulting case with a market-leader company in Portugal. All of this in my first year. For gaining experience it is absolutely great. However the course itself is not my favourite part. Having done an international programme during school a felt it was a bit boring and unrelated to my degree, at times. But for those coming from Portuguese system this might be different. The student life, location, and teachers are also amazing. I definetly would recommend for students looking for higher education in Portugal!
Nothing to show
We pay a lot and we don´t have the best conditions. We have good teachers but there are a lot of teachers that are not that good at teaching and don´t give the best grades. The computers are old and it´s difficult to work with them.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
