EU Business School vs Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU vs Technical University of Munich - TUM vs Macromedia University of Applied Sciences vs Hochschule Fresenius

Side-by-side comparison from 407 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hochschule Fresenius (4.30)
EU Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich - LMU: wins 4/7 categories
Technical University of Munich - TUM: wins 0/7 categories
Macromedia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Hochschule Fresenius: wins 1/7 categories
ABC Business Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Staatliche Berufsschule Bad Wörishofen - BSMN: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.90
Read more reviews
251 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: Communication and Media Studies
Idstein, Germany
4.30
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics
Toronto, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.27
Win
4.22
3.67
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.73
4.20
4.19
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.04
4.18
Win
4.10
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.72
Win
4.15
4.29
4.67
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.22
Win
4.19
3.93
3.67
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.87
4.25
Win
4.20
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.42
4.04
Win
3.75
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and career support
  • +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
  • +Enriching overall student experience
  • +High-quality teaching and practical experience
  • +Strong academic reputation and international environment
  • +Well-organized programs with personalization options
  • +Flexible and diverse program options
  • +High academic standards and career prospects
  • +Supportive professors and student community
  • +Broadened horizons and excellent networking
  • +Valuable real-world experience through company work
  • +Supportive and understanding staff
  • +Relevant and varied course content
  • +Helpful and educated faculty
  • +Supportive university staff

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
  • -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
  • -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder academic progress and student well-being.
  • -Ineffective and unhelpful legal representation exacerbates problems.
  • -Poor quality of education and lecturer qualifications.
  • -High tuition fees disproportionate to class availability and contact hours.
  • -Lack of organization and clear communication from administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.

This institution garners strong marks across the board. Its **facilities** stand out with the highest rating at 4.27. The **value** proposition is also highly regarded, scoring 4.25. Areas like **professors**, **location**, and **student life** are all rated around 4.19-4.20, indicating solid performance. **Accommodation** is the relatively weakest area, though still positive at 4.04. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.15.

This university garners excellent marks, particularly in **Internationality** (4.29) and **Facilities** (4.22). **Value** (4.20) and **Location** (4.19) also receive high scores. While **Student Life** (3.93) and **Accomodation** (3.75) are the lowest-rated aspects, they remain reasonably positive, suggesting a generally well-regarded institution.

Examining the university's ratings reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, earning a high score. Strong performance is also noted for **Location** and **Professors**. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Value** received the lowest ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement.

With a perfect score of 5, location stands out as the university's strongest asset. Student life, however, received the lowest rating at 3.33. Facilities and internationality scored a respectable 3.67, while professors and value were rated highly at 4. Accommodations were rated at 3.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), with an average rating of 4.08/5. Students praise the high quality of teaching, practical project opportunities, and enriching international environment. Negative feedback is negligible.

Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting flexible academic systems, diverse specializations, and good career prospects (~98%). A small amount of negative feedback mentions scheduling conflicts and administrative issues.

With an average rating of 3/5 from three reviews, approximately 67% of feedback is negative. Students cite concerns about academic quality and value for money. One positive review highlighted broad horizons and networking opportunities.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%) with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise course content, helpful lecturers, and good accommodation. A few minor criticisms mention strict grading in one course and occasional unhelpful teachers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
27%
10%
16%
33%
33%
0%
0%
4★
45%
88%
79%
0%
67%
0%
0%
3★
21%
2%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
4%
0%
1%
67%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Student-Staff relationship

As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.

Up to date equipment

There are superior facilities at the FH Aachen. The tutorial halls and classes are sophisticated, equipped with the the current and innovative equipment, and the library is large and well-stocked. To guarantee that students have a positive college experience, the educational facility also offers a range of extracurricular activities and events.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Well structured course

Basically, it’s a private university with a good reputation and also the lecturers are well educated and helpful. The course contains 60% of management-related modules and the remaining technical modules. For anyone who is searching for a techno-management course, I would suggest Hochschule Fresenius.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close