SKEMA Business School vs William Jessup University vs Mills College vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 176 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/4 categories
William Jessup University: wins 3/4 categories
Mills College: wins 0/4 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Schiller International University: wins 1/4 categories
Udacity: wins 0/4 categories
Converse University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Rocklin, California, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Oakland, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Oakland, California, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Sacramento, California, United States
4.80
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: History
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.43
3.83
3.00
4.79
Location
4.24
4.50
Not rated
4.64
4.92
Win
3.00
4.79
Professors
4.41
5.00
Not rated
3.86
4.58
5.00
4.79
Internationality
4.35
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.92
4.67
3.50
Student life
4.10
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.07
4.08
3.00
4.67
Value
4.03
5.00
Not rated
3.64
4.17
5.00
4.43
Accommodation
3.56
5.00
Not rated
2.50
3.67
5.00
4.67
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, hands-on application of skills in business contexts
  • +Relevant, up-to-date curriculum with industry-experienced professors
  • +International experience and career support
  • +Supportive academic and faith-based community
  • +Experienced teachers offering valuable knowledge and guidance
  • +Opportunities for professional networking and career development

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive instructors
  • +Opportunities for international exposure and cultural immersion
  • +Practical experience and career advancement support
  • +Engaging and enjoyable learning experience
  • +Realistic projects and experienced tutors
  • +Personalized and flexible learning options
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable professors
  • +Small class sizes and personal learning environment
  • +Diverse educational opportunities and resources
Cons
  • -Poor communication and guidance from administration and faculty.
  • -Disorganized program management and overwhelming course loads.
  • -Concerns about faculty behavior and the school's financial focus over student well-being.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a recurring concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate academic support and resources is a major drawback.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities for early students.
  • -Poor campus environment and lack of engagement.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
  • -Poor communication and lack of student support are frequently mentioned.
Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its teaching staff, receiving a high rating for professors. Internationality and location also received positive scores, indicating strong performance in these areas. However, accommodation presents a weaker point, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Overall, student life, facilities, and value for money are rated reasonably well.

This institution excels across most assessed aspects, with outstanding scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still very strong, rating is its location.

Nothing to show

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

Considerable acclaim has been received across multiple university aspects. The institution excels particularly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.92. **Professors** also garnered high marks at 4.58. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 3.67, with **Facilities** also being a relative weakness at 3.83. **Student Life** and **Value** scored moderately well.

This institution demonstrates a varied performance across key metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, Accomodation, and Value, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as areas for improvement, with ratings of 3. The university also scores well in Internationality, indicating a globally engaged environment.

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback across multiple aspects. Its facilities, professors, and location are exceptionally strong, all scoring very similarly high. Student life and accommodation also fare well. The primary area for improvement is internationality, which is rated significantly lower than other categories. Value for money is also rated quite positively, though not at the highest tier.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.34 average rating from 132 reviews, ~90% are positive, highlighting practical AI and marketing curricula, and international experiences. A small ~3% of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Reviews are exclusively positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight valuable learning experiences from experienced teachers and a supportive, faith-based community. Opportunities for professional networking are also appreciated.

Nothing to show

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 based on 12 reviews, approximately 92% of feedback is positive, highlighting independent learning opportunities, practical professors, and a good study abroad experience. A small portion (~8%) of reviews express dissatisfaction with limited extracurriculars and job opportunities.

All 3 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students found the lessons engaging and realistic, with experienced tutors and practical projects contributing to a positive learning experience.

All 14 reviews are positive, averaging 4.79/5. Students praise the university's diverse programs, excellent professors, and supportive environment, highlighting small class sizes and mentorship. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
100%
0%
21%
67%
100%
79%
4★
42%
0%
0%
50%
25%
0%
21%
3★
7%
0%
0%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Intro to Python Programming

I liked how there was a quick questionnaire during onboarding to personalize my experience. In my case, I did the course to see if the subject matter was the right one for me, as I do not have a technical background. I could choose to study around my schedule or to follow a disciplined program, which is what I need sometimes to help with motivation levels. Maybe a short course on its own is not enough to start working in this field, but I enjoyed the process and hope to be able to work on some different projects at my current job in the future, or at the very least, communicate with our dev team a bit better.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close