EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs UIC Barcelona
Side-by-side comparison from 581 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and practical application
- +Enriching international and multi-cultural environment
- +Supportive and welcoming community and staff
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Diverse and international community fostering personal growth and networking.
- +Excellent professors and practical learning with real-world application opportunities.
- +Supportive environment with intense, up-to-date academics and strong career placements.
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical, applied learning focus
- +Engaging, creative teaching methods
- +Supportive and inspiring instructors
- +Welcoming and safe community
- +Excellent instructors and support
- +Relevant and up-to-date curriculum
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and ineffective processes.
- -Lack of promised program focus.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and financial issues, including poor handling of refunds and lack of server capacity.
- -Lack of focus on intellectual development and critical thinking.
- -Negative peer environment and perceived bullying.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Disappointing value for money, especially for full-time programs.
- -Inconsistent and inadequate course materials and instruction.
- -Poor organization and communication from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and communication from instructors is disappointing.
This institution garners notable acclaim, particularly for its exceptional location, which received the highest rating. Internationality and student life also stand out as strong points. Conversely, accommodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect compared to other assessed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a generally positive standing across various university life elements.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
This institution demonstrates robust performance across various metrics. Its strongest area is **Professors**, with an impressive rating of 4.38. **Value** also scores highly at 4.26, closely followed by **Student Life** at 4.12 and **Internationality** at 4.09. The weakest areas are **Facilities** at 3.97 and **Accomodation** at 3.83, though these still represent solid scores.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution garners impressive ratings across multiple facets, notably excelling in **Internationality (4.8)** and **Professors (4.75)**. Facilities and Student Life also score highly at 4.65. Areas scoring lower, though still strong, include Location and Accommodation, both at 4.41. The university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with outstanding marks in its global reach and academic staff.
This institution receives particularly high marks for **Internationality** (4.92) and **Location** (4.83), indicating a vibrant global presence and desirable setting. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also score very well at 4.5. **Value** is rated as the comparatively weakest area at 4.25, though still a respectable score. Professors and student life also maintain strong ratings.
Approximately 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic quality, expert professors, and enriching multicultural environments. A small percentage of feedback (~2%) mentioned issues with course communication and administrative inflexibility.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With ~92% of reviews being positive, students highlight valuable international environments, diverse communities, and practical learning. Some negative feedback, representing ~8%, mentions concerns about program value and specific logistical issues.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.8/5 based on 20 reviews, ~95% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights practical application, creative thinking, and inspiring teachers. A single negative review (5%) found the full-time program costly for limited class hours.
University students give very positive reviews, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars. They praise welcoming culture, excellent instructors, and effective job placement support. No negative feedback was recorded.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
