Sciences Po vs Université de Bourgogne - UB vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Burgundy School of Business vs School of Wine & Spirits Business
Side-by-side comparison from 105 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum with practical applications
- +Networking opportunities and vibrant student life
- +Prestigious institution with accomplished faculty
- +Engaging faculty and practical, skill-building programs
- +Supportive and inspiring campus environment
- +Smooth application and onboarding process
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging and high-quality programs with experienced professors.
- +Convenient and pleasant location with good infrastructure.
- +International diversity and friendly atmosphere.
Nothing to show
- +Practical and hands-on learning
- +Study abroad opportunities and international exposure
- +Professional and passionate professors
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and academic methods.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder educational experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support causes frustration.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Inadequate return on investment for the high tuition fees.
- -Poor organizational structure hinders professors.
- -Insufficient career services and limited networking opportunities.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from instructors and the university is a common complaint.
Nothing to show
Internationality and location stand out as the university's strongest attributes, receiving exceptional ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Professors, student life, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded experience, though facilities fall in the middle ground.
Academic and student experience factors generally received positive feedback, with Student Life standing out as the strongest area. Facilities and Internationality also garnered high scores. The university's Location was rated as the weakest aspect among the surveyed categories, though still within a respectable range. Overall, the institution demonstrates a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in student engagement and international appeal.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Academic and student experiences at this institution are generally well-regarded, with the location standing out as a particular strength. Professors and student life also received very positive feedback. However, areas such as facilities and accommodation represent opportunities for improvement, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Internationality and value for money fall within the mid-range of assessments.
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, this institution demonstrates a strong academic reputation. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.7, with location and internationality also scoring highly at 4.3. Student life and accommodation are similarly rated at approximately 3.78, while facilities present the weakest area with a score of 3.9. Overall, the university offers good value at 4.2.
Nothing to show
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary education, strong academics, and vibrant student life. A small percentage (~4%) express concerns about teaching methods and academic staff preparation.
The Université de Bourgogne receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~88% of 33 reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight esteemed faculty, practical learning, and an inclusive campus environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
~63% of reviews are positive, praising location, program quality, and experiential learning. ~13% are negative, citing cost-effectiveness and facility issues. The average rating is 3.63/5.
Nothing to show
All ten reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight practical, dynamic classes, passionate professors, and beneficial study abroad programs that enhance skills and career prospects. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
I found a tight-knit community at Ecole Vatel, with valuable networking and experiential learning opportunities. The intimate setting allows professors to tailor their guidance, equipping students with applicable knowledge and skills. This personalized approach motivated me to reach my full potential and feel better about transitioning into the workforce.
Nothing to show
