emlyon business school vs IAE Lyon School of Management vs ESSCA School of Management vs INSEEC Business School vs Ecole de Management IFAG
Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body
- +Opportunities for professional development and real-world experience
- +Strong academic programs and supportive resources
- +Small class sizes and ideal study conditions
- +Diverse guest speakers from academic and entrepreneurial backgrounds
- +Focus on innovative learning and support for student initiatives
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and multicultural learning environment
- +Practical application of knowledge
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Lack of practical value in coursework and insufficient learning.
- -Frustrating and unfair grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program management.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies.
- -Lack of support and irrelevant course content.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and course content leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in both **Internationality** (4.59) and **Location** (4.57), indicating excellent global engagement and a desirable setting. **Value** for money is also highly rated (4.41). The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring the lowest at 3.94, though other aspects like Student Life (4.25) and Facilities (4.15) remain solid. Professors also receive a respectable rating of 4.06.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location**, achieving a perfect score, and a strong showing in **Student Life** with a 4. Its **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated moderately at 3.5. However, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** received the lowest scores, both at 3. Despite these areas for improvement, the university offers good **Value** at 4.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
This institution garners high marks for its location and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.62. Professors and student life also received solid ratings of 4.00 and 4.10 respectively. Areas for potential improvement include facilities, rated at 3.57, and accommodation, which received a 3.25. Value for money is assessed at 3.76, indicating a generally positive but not outstanding performance.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~98%), praising academic rigor, practical application, and international diversity. A small percentage (~2%) expressed disappointment with course content and grading fairness.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is largely positive. Reviews highlight ideal study conditions, particularly within master programs, and a strong focus on entrepreneurial initiatives.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
With 16 out of 23 reviews being positive (~74%), students highlight strong program content and professional preparation. They appreciate skill development and practical application, alongside a friendly atmosphere and helpful professors.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
