SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs University of New Hampshire - NH vs Schiller International University vs Simplilearn
Side-by-side comparison from 298 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Welcoming community and supportive faculty
- +Quality education and diverse opportunities
- +Positive campus atmosphere and sense of belonging
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +High-quality, in-demand skills taught by experts
- +Career-focused outcomes, especially remote tech jobs
- +Exceptional free and paid course content
- +Strong, respected, and comprehensive business programs
- +Supportive community and challenging environment
- +Well-equipped and accessible facilities
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty is a major concern.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources for learning.
- -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution garners outstanding marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for Location and Student Life. Professors and Value are also exceptionally strong at 4.83. While Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are rated well, they represent the comparatively weaker aspects, with Accomodation standing at 4.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5. The sole area of concern is accommodation, which received a score of 0. This indicates a significant disconnect in housing provisions compared to other strengths.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its professor quality and value, both achieving a perfect 5. Facilities and location also receive very high marks at 4.75. While student life and accommodation are strong at 4.5, the university's internationality, rated at 4.25, is its comparatively lowest performing area, though still a solid score.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
All reviews are positive, with students praising world-class mentoring, incredible professors, and diverse opportunities. The campus atmosphere and feeling included are also highlighted.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This ~100% positive feedback highlights exceptional course content and the acquisition of in-demand digital skills beneficial for securing tech jobs.
All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight transformative experiences, a supportive environment, and exciting, challenging curricula. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
