Abo Akademi University - AAU vs Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences vs Estonian Business School - EBS
Side-by-side comparison from 102 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and helpful faculty/staff
- +Excellent facilities and central location
- +Welcoming international environment and diverse programs
- +Interdisciplinary learning and study freedom
- +International community and diverse peers
- +Rigorous curriculum and independent learning
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Practical, business-oriented programmes with flexible scheduling
- +Supportive community and accessible guidance from professors and staff
- +High-quality education with experienced teachers and a friendly atmosphere
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects.
- +Industry-relevant programs and career preparation.
- +Innovative, student-centered approach.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Lack of support and resources hinders academic success and well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of adequate student support services is a major concern.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology were a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and resources hindered learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content is irrelevant or too theoretical.
Exceptional ratings paint a picture of a top-tier institution. This university achieves a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. No single area stands out as significantly stronger or weaker than the others, as all aspects are consistently rated at the highest level.
Student life and facilities stand out as particularly strong points, both receiving high marks. Conversely, professors are rated the lowest among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile, with accommodations, internationality, and value also scoring well. Location also received a favorable rating.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **location** (4.89) and **internationality** (4.8). Facilities and student life are also well-regarded, each receiving a solid 4.0. Accommodation is rated similarly. The weakest area is **professors**, with a rating of 3.7, though the overall value for money remains strong at 4.2.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
Overall, this university garners strong positive feedback, particularly excelling in its **Internationality** (5.0), with equally impressive scores for **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** (all 4.5). The **Value** for money is also highly rated at 4.5. Areas for potential improvement are **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of 3.5.
Five out of six reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful staff, and excellent infrastructure.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93%), highlighting opportunities for personal and academic growth, international connections, and freedom in studies. A small minority (~7%) provided no negative feedback, suggesting a generally satisfactory experience.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a ~82% positive sentiment, students praise concrete, business-oriented studies and flexibility. They also highlight a supportive, friendly community and a good work-life balance. Limited negative feedback was noted.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, the two reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-relevant education and hands-on learning experiences. No negative feedback was received.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
