Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - UPPA vs emlyon business school vs IAE Pau - Bayonne vs Excelia Business School vs éklore-ed School of Management

Side-by-side comparison from 125 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: CY Tech (5.00)
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour - UPPA: wins 0/7 categories
emlyon business school: wins 1/7 categories
IAE Pau - Bayonne: wins 0/7 categories
Excelia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
éklore-ed School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
CY Tech: wins 6/7 categories
CESI: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
La Rochelle, France
4.10
Read more reviews
67 reviews
×
Best programme: Master of Science (MSc)
Cergy, France
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.16
Win
Not rated
4.02
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
Not rated
4.54
Not rated
4.30
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
Not rated
4.05
Not rated
3.91
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
Not rated
4.56
Not rated
4.30
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Student life
Not rated
4.24
Not rated
4.25
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
3.91
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
Not rated
3.94
Not rated
3.66
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent reputation, internationality, and staff availability.
  • +Wide variety of majors offered.
  • +Good choice for students preferring a smaller, quieter city environment.
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.

Nothing to show

  • +Practical learning, internships, and experienced instructors.
  • +International exposure and multicultural environment.
  • +High-quality teaching and good course content.

Nothing to show

  • +Accessible international policies
  • +Focus on scientific research development

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of support from staff cause frustration.
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.

Nothing to show

  • -Superficial academic content and lack of practical value.
  • -Ineffective career support, including internships and apprenticeships.
  • -Courses not aligning with student expectations or career goals.

Nothing to show

  • -Lack of clear communication and organization from staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engagement.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this university received a rating of zero in all surveyed categories, indicating no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The consistent lack of positive or negative feedback across all aspects suggests a neutral, undeveloped, or universally unmet standard across the board.

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

Nothing to show

Performing exceptionally well, this university boasts its strongest ratings in **Location** (4.30) and **Internationality** (4.30), closely followed by **Student Life** (4.25). Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.66, and **Professors** and **Value**, both rated at 3.91. The **Facilities** score stands at a respectable 4.02.

Nothing to show

This institution excels in several key areas, with professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, facilities appear to be a significant area for improvement, indicated by a rating of zero. The university presents a highly positive experience for its students in most aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, UPPA is praised for its strong reputation, international appeal, and program variety. Staff professionalism is also highlighted.

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

Nothing to show

With a 4.07/5 average, ~82% of reviews are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and a multicultural environment. A small ~4.5% of feedback is negative, citing superficial course coverage and limited practical value.

Nothing to show

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with a perfect 5/5 average rating. One review highlights its strong international policy and emphasis on scientific research development.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
58%
0%
31%
0%
100%
0%
4★
100%
29%
0%
51%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
11%
0%
13%
100%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close