Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs University of Oulu - OY vs University of Turku
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible and multidisciplinary learning
- +Strong foundational and independent learning
- +Supportive community and active student life
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
- +Interactive and safe learning environment
- +Opportunities for group study and exploration of new fields
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and poor curriculum design lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & equipment
- -Lack of resources & support
This university receives strong commendations, particularly for its **Student Life** and **Facilities**, both scoring above 4.5. **Accomodation** and **Value** are also highly rated, each at 4.39. **Professors** represent the lowest-scoring area, though still rated positively. The university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with notable strengths in its campus environment and student experience.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in every surveyed area. Its strongest performance is evident in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, all achieving a top rating. There are no discernible weakest areas based on these ratings.
Students highly recommend the university, praising its multidisciplinary courses and freedom to study outside their major (~90%). Positive feedback highlights independent learning, excellent facilities, and strong community support, with no reported negative reviews.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, and 100% of feedback is positive. The positive feedback highlights an interactive and good study environment, with opportunities for group study and feeling safe to discuss sensitive topics.
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
