Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Centria University of Applied Sciences vs University of Eastern Finland vs University of Oulu - OY
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Supportive professors and practical learning
- +Global opportunities and accessible location
- +Personal development and useful knowledge acquisition
- +Practical study experience with supportive faculty and accessible campus facilities.
- +Welcoming and diverse campus environment fostering social opportunities.
- +Efficient education and proximity to nature for leisure.
- +High-quality education and strong programs, especially in ICT and wireless technology.
- +Supportive and international learning environment with modern facilities.
- +Good city life, student culture, and career preparation support.
- +Industry connection and practical experience
- +Relevant, real-world focused curriculum
Nothing to show
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of essential resources and support negatively impacts student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resource allocation are consistently criticized.
- -A lack of effective teaching and curriculum relevance is a major concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common source of dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of effective teaching and engaging curriculum is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
Overall, this institution garners strong marks, with accommodation and value standing out as exceptional strengths, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality are all rated highly, demonstrating a consistently positive experience across these key aspects.
This institution garners exceptional scores, notably achieving a perfect 5 for Student Life. Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation are also highly rated at 4.33. Location and Internationality are solid at 4, with Value also receiving a 4. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value at 4.
This institution excels significantly in its **Facilities** and **Value**, both receiving near-perfect scores. **Accomodation** is also a strong point. Conversely, the **Location** is the weakest area, indicating potential drawbacks in this aspect. **Student Life** and **Internationality** show moderate performance, suggesting room for improvement in fostering a vibrant campus experience and a more global outlook.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **internationality**, achieving a perfect score, and its **facilities**, **professors**, and **accommodation**, all receiving high marks. Conversely, the **location** stands out as its weakest area, indicated by a lower rating. Student life and overall value are rated respectably in the middle tier.
Nothing to show
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With a 4/5 average rating and no negative feedback (~0%), students praise freedom to develop, practical learning, and supportive professors. The university's global network and accessible location with affordable accommodation are also highlighted.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5 stars. Students highlight practical study experiences, excellent welfare and social activities, and a welcoming, diverse campus environment.
All 7 reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the high-quality education, excellent facilities, and supportive, international environment, particularly in ICT and health tech. No negative feedback was reported.
This single review offers a positive perspective, highlighting strong industry connections and relevant, real-world focused coursework. The average rating is 4/5, with 100% of feedback being positive.
Nothing to show
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Centria UAS is a good university where students feel free to develop themselves and learn useful knowledge. The school has a broad Erasmus network and other partners around the world. Professors at Centria are qualified and enthusiastic in their lectures. They are always willing to help and encourage students in any problems. The theory is practically applied in every lesson via teamwork, presentations, and assignments. Cheap accommodation and easy to access to the school due to a good location. Staff are very friendly, helpful and polite. I have enjoyed a great time at Centria and went on a Double degree exchange program in France which would be obviously a great opportunity for my career prospects. About Kokkola, it is a small town with all warmhearted and helpful people. I always feel safe when staying here. This place is like my second home.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
