Université Catholique de Lille vs IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs EDHEC Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 474 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: IÉSEG School of Management (4.50)
Université Catholique de Lille: wins 1/5 categories
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/5 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/5 categories
EPITECH - EPITECH: wins 4/5 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/5 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/5 categories
IMT Nord Europe: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.20
4.08
4.21
4.50
Win
4.23
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.50
4.29
4.23
4.50
3.77
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.60
4.28
4.39
5.00
Win
4.32
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.20
4.55
4.40
5.00
Win
4.45
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.40
4.25
4.14
5.00
Win
4.13
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
4.31
4.07
4.50
4.06
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.30
Win
3.78
3.59
3.50
3.21
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and attentive professors fostering close student relationships.
  • +Diverse and engaging courses with practical application and professional focus.
  • +Welcoming environment and beautiful campus contributing to a positive experience.
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international and diverse community
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
  • +International environment and diverse student body
  • +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
  • +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
  • +Strong company network for work-study and employment.
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and poor curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
  • -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
  • -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
  • -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
  • -High cost of education.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.6, indicating a strong academic core. Location and value are also highly regarded, both receiving 4.5. The weakest area appears to be facilities, with a rating of 4.2, though this remains a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a robust offering, with student life and accommodation also scoring well.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.

This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students praise competent professors and engaging courses, highlighting a good balance of academic rigor and student well-being. The university is highly recommended.

Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.

Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.

Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
42%
49%
50%
20%
38%
0%
0%
4★
67%
44%
42%
20%
53%
0%
0%
3★
0%
8%
7%
20%
9%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
1%
20%
2%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
1%
20%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close