Université Catholique de Lille vs IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Lille vs SKEMA Business School vs Paris Graduate School of Digital Innovation - EPITECH
Side-by-side comparison from 487 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate and attentive professors fostering close student relationships.
- +Diverse and engaging courses with practical application and professional focus.
- +Welcoming environment and beautiful campus contributing to a positive experience.
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +Supportive and well-trained faculty
- +Relevant and in-depth programs with ample lab work
- +Abundant opportunities and advanced facilities
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Innovative, hands-on learning approach
- +Strong emphasis on independence and self-sufficiency
- +Challenging but rewarding educational experience
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and poor curriculum lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of career support and job prospects
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of student well-being focus and a profit-driven approach that compromises educational quality.
- -Insufficient focus on soft skills development alongside technical education.
- -High cost relative to the perceived value or quality of education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. Professors are exceptionally rated at 4.6, indicating a strong academic core. Location and value are also highly regarded, both receiving 4.5. The weakest area appears to be facilities, with a rating of 4.2, though this remains a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a robust offering, with student life and accommodation also scoring well.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
This university garners excellent feedback for its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.12. Internationality is also well-regarded at 3.98. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest rating at 3.74, closely followed by **Location** at 3.76. Professors and Value fall within a similar, moderate range.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, and student life, alongside strong internationality. Location also scores well, contributing to a positive overall impression. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a moderate rating. The value proposition is considered good, reflecting a generally positive assessment with room for improvement in housing.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Nothing to show
All 13 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students praise competent professors and engaging courses, highlighting a good balance of academic rigor and student well-being. The university is highly recommended.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~84% of feedback), highlighting advanced labs, diverse opportunities, and supportive lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded among the 45 reviews.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With a 2.5/5 average rating, reviews are mixed, with approximately 25% positive and 50% negative feedback. Recurring themes include a strong technical environment versus a lack of soft skills training, and concerns about the school's focus on profit over student well-being.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
