City St George’s, University of London - City vs University of Wales Trinity Saint David vs University of Roehampton vs St George's University of London vs Regent College London - RCL
Side-by-side comparison from 177 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and knowledgeable, supportive staff
- +Excellent location and vibrant surrounding environment
- +High employability support and valuable internship opportunities
- +Supportive teaching and individual attention
- +Practical and applied learning opportunities
- +Friendly and supportive environment
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- +Exceptional teaching and expert faculty
- +Strong practical and career focus
- +Supportive community and facilities
- +Wide module variety and relevant courses
- +Strong student support and opportunities
- +Practical knowledge for career preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and low academic standards.
- -Unmet expectations and perceived focus on profit over student learning.
- -Inappropriate course focus for experienced professionals.
- -Primarily online delivery and poor career support.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution achieves impressive scores, particularly excelling in its Facilities, rated at 4.35, and Internationality, at 4.33. Student Life and Location also perform well, both above 4.1. The primary area for improvement identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.95, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with a slight opportunity for enhancement in student housing.
This university receives commendations across several key areas. Notably, **Location** and **Professors** stand out with the highest scores. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** received slightly lower, though still respectable, ratings, representing the weakest aspects of the assessment. The university demonstrates a good balance with solid marks in Facilities, Internationality, and Value.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
A robust evaluation reveals exceptional strength in academics, with both professors and value scoring a high 4.375. Facilities also perform well at 4.125. Student life and internationality are rated a solid 4. Accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.428, while location registers at 3.75, indicating these are areas for potential improvement.
This university excels remarkably in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, as well as strong value. However, significant weaknesses are evident in student life and accommodation, both of which are rated at zero.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.3/5 average rating from 106 reviews, ~91.5% of students are highly satisfied. Positive feedback highlights strong courses, knowledgeable staff, and ideal city-centre locations. Very few reviews (approx. 1.9%) express dissatisfaction.
University reviews are largely positive, with ~74% rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.29/5. Students praise supportive teaching and practical learning, while a small minority expressed disappointment with online learning and career support.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
With a ~88% positive sentiment, reviews highlight strong teaching, excellent facilities, and a supportive community. Some mention administrative issues.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The student highlighted access to diverse modules and courses, strong student support, and preparation for the job market. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My time at City University London was truly transformative. The university's vibrant community and diverse extracurricular activities allowed me to forge lifelong friendships and professional connections that extend beyond the classroom. I was impressed by the university's commitment to academic rigor, character development, and personal growth, which created an ideal environment for me to reach my full potential. The research-driven and industry-relevant curriculum provided me with a solid foundation in international business, while the dedicated faculty and staff offered invaluable guidance and support. I feel grateful for the well-rounded education and holistic experience that City University London offered, preparing me for success in my career and beyond.
The University of Wales Trinity Saint David is a good university for students who want strong teaching, smaller classes, and a supportive environment, especially in creative or applied subjects. However, it may not be the best choice if you are looking for high global prestige, major research opportunities, or a big city student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
