Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Ulster University vs St George's University of London vs European School of Economics - ESE vs London School of Planning and Management - LSPM
Side-by-side comparison from 294 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Convenient location and modern facilities
- +Supportive and engaging lecturers
- +Industry-focused and practical learning
- +Exceptional faculty expertise and support
- +Unique, hands-on learning experiences
- +Strong sense of community and belonging
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Flexible, self-paced learning
- +Helpful instructors and fast support
- +Relevant and high-quality course material
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Lack of responsiveness and support from staff is common.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often criticized for being poor or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Poor course structure and teaching quality detract from the learning experience.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Reviewing university metrics reveals a generally positive assessment. The institution excels in **Professor quality**, boasting a 4.37 rating, and also scores highly for **Value** at 4.26. Areas like **Student Life** (3.97) and **Accommodations** (3.66) represent the lower end of the spectrum, though still within a respectable range. Other aspects such as Facilities, Location, and Internationality all fall around the 4.1 mark.
Overall, this university garners a positive reception with several areas receiving high marks. Its strongest aspects include Internationality, Value, and Professors, all achieving an impressive 4.33. Student Life and Facilities also score well at 4. However, Location and Accomodation present as the weaker points, with ratings of 3.5 and 3.4 respectively.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Every aspect, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodations, was rated a strong 5. Its prime location and international appeal also contributed to this uniformly excellent evaluation, indicating exceptional value for students. There are no discernible weak areas based on this data.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
~97% of reviews are positive, praising the great location, supportive lecturers, and industry-focused courses. Only ~3% of feedback mentioned issues with campus management.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews). Students highlight excellent faculty support, a well-structured hybrid course, and a strong sense of community, feeling like a home away from home.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility and helpful instructors. They highlight acquiring skills and the convenience of self-paced learning.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
