London Metropolitan University vs University of the West of Scotland - UWS vs Newcastle University vs Keele University - KLE vs Writtle University College
Side-by-side comparison from 269 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and mentorship
- +Diverse and inclusive environment
- +Career-focused and practical programs
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
- +Engaging, innovative, and comprehensive course content
- +Vibrant campus life and diverse student community
- +Strong academic programs with practical application
- +Supportive professors and faculty
- +Vibrant campus and city life with opportunities for friendship
- +High-quality teaching and strong academic support
- +Supportive learning environment and student services
- +Practical training and industry/career focus
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching standards and lecturer support
- +Strong career preparation and relevant course content
- +Comprehensive student support services and inclusive environment
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and course structure.
- -Inadequate facilities and lack of administrative support.
- -Insufficient preparation for the professional world.
- -Lack of academic and administrative support.
- -Ineffective teaching and unclear assignment guidance.
- -Insufficient time for major projects.
- -Lack of academic and personal support
- -Minimal resources and effort from support teams
- -Feeling of being a "money grab"
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unclear communication and lack of student support are prevalent.
Nothing to show
- -Poor quality and unhelpful study materials are a recurring issue.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading, with general feedback, causes significant student frustration.
- -Slow and limited student support exacerbates problems.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its Location and Internationality, both scoring 4.5. Professors also received a strong rating at 4.33. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area with a score of 3.43. Student Life and Facilities are rated moderately at 3.85 and 4.04 respectively, while Value is close behind at 4.02.
Demonstrating robust strengths in key areas, this university excels with particularly high marks for its professors and internationality. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. Conversely, student life and accommodation present as areas for potential improvement, receiving the lowest scores. Location also shows room for enhancement.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.75) and **Student Life** (4.68). **Facilities** also stand out with a high score of 4.52. Areas performing slightly lower, though still strong, include **Professors** (4.2), **Accomodation** (4.22), and **Internationality** (4.29). The university achieves a respectable score of 4.12 for **Value**.
This institution receives commendable scores across most metrics. Professors, Internationality, and Facilities stand out as particularly strong areas. The university also fares well in Student Life and Value. Location is rated adequately, though Accommodations emerge as the weakest point in the assessment, receiving a noticeably lower score compared to other categories.
Nothing to show
This university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects, with professors earning the highest marks. Student life and facilities also received strong scores. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest rating, and location. Internationality and value are rated moderately well, contributing to an overall positive impression.
Nothing to show
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive mentors, diverse environments, and career-focused programs. A small percentage (around 7%) of negative feedback mentions unprofessional teaching and poorly structured courses.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable courses, supportive faculty, and a lively student environment. A single negative review mentioned a lack of course support and unhelpful lecturers.
With ~92% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.37/5, students highlight strong academic programs, supportive professors, and a positive campus environment. A single negative review noted a lack of master's level support.
With ~100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight strong academic programs, industry connections, and supportive learning environments. Specific praise focuses on teaching quality, career support, and modern facilities.
Nothing to show
University reviews are largely positive, with ~84% of 19 students giving 4-5 stars. Praises highlight strong student support, effective teaching, and career preparation. Limited negative feedback (around ~10.5%) mentions basic study materials and slow support response times.
Nothing to show
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
The lecturers in my programme are quite helpful. Would recommend they infuse some kind of practice or practicality into the program. A little bit of programme coordination, and more interaction with peers should be incorporated.
The facilities of the school of computing are great - very modern building, newest equipment, campus located in the city centre (most likely you don’t need to commute there by metro or a bus). One major thing however that is lacking is the organisation. Being a third-year student I still have the same feeling - the program is written very chaotically. In 2019 there was that revolution of the programme (to keep learning the newest technology) to which lectures and demonstrators still feel a bit unadapted. I hope this will get better in the next year or two years. However, after that time, the taught technology may change again (which is good) and it will take another couple of years for the lecturers to be fluent in what they teaching (which is not good).
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am studying the course. The study materials are so basic. You will not learn anything from the courses. The grades will always be up to the markers, who just do whatever they want, without following the criteria. Feedbacks have been so general without any meanings. I have suffered mental trauma and depression due to this course. Support are limited and students have to wait 1-2 weeks or more just to get a reply. Do yourself a favor and find other universities. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED!
Nothing to show
