Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Université de Montréal vs HEC Montreal vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS
Side-by-side comparison from 91 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Approachable and qualified professors with effective teaching methods.
- +Practical, career-focused learning and development of useful skills.
- +Strong student support and integration for international students.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and challenging coursework
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
- +Strong career preparation and job market focus
- +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- +Expert and dedicated professors
- +Vibrant student life
- -Lack of support and poor communication from the university.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
- -Administrative & management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Lack of effective communication leads to unmet student expectations.
Among surveyed categories, this institution excels in **Location** with a rating of 4.6, followed closely by **Professors** at 4.28 and **Student Life** at 4.24. The **Value** for money emerges as the comparatively weaker area, scoring 3.83. Ratings for Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality are all solid, falling between 3.9 and 4.1.
Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.
This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Across all surveyed categories, this institution received perfect scores. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value were all rated a maximum of 5 out of 5. The university demonstrates exceptional strength in every area evaluated, with no particular category standing out as weaker than others given the uniformly high marks.
With a 4.32 average rating, nearly all (~95%) of 19 reviews are positive. Students praise approachable, qualified professors and enjoyable, practical teaching methods. One review noted a lack of support.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
With a 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise competent professors and a vibrant student life. No negative reviews were submitted.
After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.
Nothing to show
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
