École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Paris-La Villette - ENSAPLV vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs INSEEC Business School vs Schiller International University

Side-by-side comparison from 209 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Schiller International University (4.50)
École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Paris-La Villette - ENSAPLV: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
INSEEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 3/7 categories
Ironhack: wins 4/7 categories
IKI Paris Graduate School: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.20
4.20
3.43
3.92
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
3.50
4.24
3.73
4.64
4.92
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.50
4.41
4.32
3.86
4.62
Win
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
4.36
4.41
4.50
4.92
Win
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
4.10
4.14
4.07
4.15
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.50
4.04
4.05
3.64
4.23
Win
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.56
3.14
2.50
3.62
4.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +International experience and global perspective
  • +Strong academic foundation in specific fields
  • +Immersive project-based learning
  • +International focus and diverse campus experiences
  • +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
  • +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
  • +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
  • +Strong alumni network and career services support
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
  • +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
  • +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
  • +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus upkeep are significant complaints.
  • -Lack of transparency and unclear communication are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
  • -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
  • -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
  • -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
  • -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
  • -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With a strong showing in academics, the university received high marks for its professors (4.5). Student life and facilities also scored well at 4. The institution's weakest areas are accommodation and internationality, both rated at 3. Location and value received moderate scores of 3.5, contributing to a generally positive but varied evaluation.

Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.

With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight immersive international and cross-cultural experiences, along with a strong academic foundation in technology, management, and architecture.

The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.

Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.

With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
33%
49%
39%
21%
69%
50%
0%
4★
67%
42%
52%
50%
23%
0%
0%
3★
0%
7%
9%
43%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
2%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Learning in a practical way

This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.

For the love of Schiller

Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close