Université Lumière Lyon 2 - L2 vs emlyon business school vs Burgundy School of Business vs ESDES School of Management vs ILERI School of International Relations
Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Quality teaching and internationally recognized educators
- +Accessible campus locations and good public transport
- +Opportunities for idea exchange and interactive learning
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Experienced and approachable instructors
- +Practical, relevant curriculum
- +Supportive environment and good location
Nothing to show
- +Broad international focus and cross-cultural learning
- +Strong professional development and recognized technical training
- +Opportunities for networking and future connections
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder program quality.
- -Program value is not commensurate with the high tuition fees.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of responsiveness and clear communication from staff is a major complaint.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university exhibits a varied performance across key aspects. Its strongest areas are **Student Life (4.3)** and **Location (4.18)**, indicating a vibrant campus experience and desirable setting. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.58)** and **Facilities (2.9)** received the lowest scores, suggesting potential room for improvement in these practical resources. Other categories like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a moderate to good range.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks at 4.44. Professors and student life also scored very well, both at 4.22. Conversely, accommodation and facilities represent the weakest aspects, with scores of 3.56 and 3.63 respectively. The university shows a moderate performance in internationality and value.
Nothing to show
Overall, the university garners positive ratings, with **Student Life** and **Value** standing out as exceptional strengths. Professors and Internationality also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** appears to be the weakest area, with ratings for Facilities and Location also being moderate. The university presents a well-rounded offering, particularly excelling in student experience and perceived worth.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 3.67 average rating, approximately 50% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful teachers and interactive classes. Some reviews mention administrative and management inefficiency, with a desire for improved CROUS catering.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
The majority of reviews (~89%) are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and a supportive environment. A small amount of negative feedback (~11%) exists, with one reviewer feeling the cost was not justified.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~67% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students highlight excellent programs, a valuable international focus, and professional development opportunities. There is no negative feedback in this sample.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As an international student attending the MBA WINE AND SPIRITS BUSINESS program and spending 32 thousand euros (besides the need of quitting my job, move, find an accommodation and change lifestyle) I would say that the school is worth less then half of what it costs. The only good aspects of it are the big students’ communities, the commitment of the international office and the quality of some teachers who cannot really give their best because they’re hampered by the strict organisation of the school programs. Administration, services and the overall school organisation are really below expectations and the educational level is just average despite the cost and the “reputation”. Everyone (classmates, other international students and french ones from all courses and years) complained about the fact that “the school used to be a good one, but now is just bad”!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
