Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs ESIC Business & Marketing School vs UIC Barcelona vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Institute of European Design - IED
Side-by-side comparison from 137 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programmes with industry relevance
- +Supportive, personal relationships with experienced professors
- +Well-organized, accessible academic environment
- +Practical learning, real-world projects, and industry connections.
- +Excellent teaching quality and knowledgeable professors.
- +Supportive campus environment and strong academic/personal guidance.
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Engaging virtual campus and resources
- +Supportive and accessible teaching staff
- +Practical, project-based learning with industry collaboration
- +Professional and dedicated teachers offering new perspectives
- +Diverse, international environment with modern facilities and opportunities
- +International community and diverse perspectives
- +Practical application of knowledge and real-world relevance
- +Knowledgeable faculty and strong subject matter expertise
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Administrative and management issues, including unprofessional and unqualified leadership.
- -Poor administrative support and unclear communication regarding academic systems.
- -Lack of orientation and support for international students.
- -Misleading information about course delivery methods.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and communication issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of structured instruction and feedback is a concern.
- -Unclear assessment criteria and disorganization cause frustration.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of instructor support are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This university garners particularly strong reviews for its **Accomodation**, scoring an impressive 4.3. Facilities also receive high marks, with a rating of 4.27. Areas performing slightly lower include Internationality, rated at 3.91, and Student Life and Location, both at 4.09. Professors and Value are also well-regarded, with scores around 4.18 and 4.09 respectively.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its **facilities**, which received a high rating. Conversely, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** represent areas that received comparatively lower scores. Other aspects like professors, location, and student life fall within a moderate range of satisfaction.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
This institution shows notable strengths in **Location** (3.85) and **Internationality** (3.72), with **Professors** (3.64) and **Value** (3.68) also receiving positive marks. However, **Student Life** emerges as the weakest area at 2.58, alongside **Facilities** at 3.05. **Accomodation** falls in the middle ground with a rating of 3.12.
This university receives excellent marks for its **facilities**, earning a remarkable 4.7 out of 5. Other strong areas include **value** (4.6) and **location** and **internationality** (both 4.4). **Professors** and **student life** are also well-regarded, scoring 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The primary area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a lower rating of 3.
Overall, this university garners exceptionally strong ratings. Internationality and Value stand out as its highest-scoring areas, both achieving near perfect marks. Student Life and Facilities also received very high scores. The weakest area, though still rated favorably, is Location, with Accomodation also scoring slightly lower than the other categories.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~92%), highlighting excellent professors and a practical academic approach. Minimal negative feedback (~8%) exists, with one mention of unprofessional management.
With 4.13 stars from 55 reviews, ~85% of students praise the collaborative learning, practical projects with real companies, and good teaching quality. One review found the university experience poor.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising the virtual campus, continuous assessment, and flexibility for work-life balance. A smaller portion of feedback notes issues with administrative errors and a lack of clear instruction or responsiveness.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 7 reviews, students praise diverse learning opportunities and the practical, project-based approach. Teachers are highly regarded for their professional expertise. Negative feedback is minimal.
All 14 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the international environment and practical, business-oriented curriculum, praising knowledgeable professors. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
Worst university ever, I’m an İNTERNATİONAL student who came just for one semester for ERASMUS from another institution. It was the worst experience ever in my life, Esic university treated me so badly. The ERASMUS coordinator is really disrespectful and he didn’t even do a welcoming day for the new students. We didn’t get any training on how we can adapt to the university's system. First, they told us it is a hybrid system, which is not the case. This is the first lie from a higher education institution. They are really trying to push me to fail administration and also teachers I really feel it’s a religious problem about where I come from , plus I did all of my exams perfectly. Now I’m surprised that one teacher wants me to fail because I didn’t do one exercise ( just one in all semester lol) , my exam was perfect now she doesn’t want to show me my results and told me that she will make me fail because of one exercise. It is not fair and no one from the administration wants to help me as an Erasmus student, but I feel there is a difference between me and Spanish nationalities. Now I will take my legal right. They really discriminated against me in every way I’m really sad how I got used and treated this badly and also this issue has now become a personal issue, I really don’t recommend any İNTERNATİONAL students to join ESIC Valencia it’s the worst university on planet earth 😡
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
I really enjoy the program because of the projects, at IED we don’t have too many theory classes instead we do projects. It’s very interesting because it allows me to be creative while also changing my perspective on design. The university has very nice and good teachers and we have access to very modern equipment.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
