EAE Business School vs IESE Business School vs Universitat de Barcelona - UB vs Universitat Oberta de Catalunya - UOC vs Institute of European Design - IED
Side-by-side comparison from 353 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
- +Expert tutors and practical, applicable knowledge
- +Comprehensive curriculum and flexible learning options
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Engaging professors and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant international and diverse student environment
- +Stimulating academic programs and practical learning focus
- +Flexible online learning and self-paced study
- +High-quality teaching materials and organized virtual platform
- +Accessible and supportive professors and tutors
- +Practical, project-based learning with industry collaboration
- +Professional and dedicated teachers offering new perspectives
- +Diverse, international environment with modern facilities and opportunities
- +Flexible online learning format
- +Comprehensive and relevant curriculum
- +Efficient support and accessible materials
- +Integrated marketing, psychology, and neuroscience curriculum
- +Expert instructors and supportive staff
- +Practical application and industry connections
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -The quality of education is criticized for being superficial and not job-preparatory.
- -Poor communication and lack of student support are significant concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources, including broken furniture and unreliable technology.
- -Traditional teaching methods lack engagement and personalization, with an emphasis on memorization.
- -Limited campus integration and insufficient digital support hinder student connection and flexibility.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant problems.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful customer service frustrates students.
- -Poorly organized and user-unfriendly online platforms hinder access to information.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of instructor support are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a recurring problem.
- -Communication is often poor, leading to confusion and unmet expectations.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in **Location**, achieving a score of 3.82. Conversely, its weakest area is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.07. Other aspects like Professor quality, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally consistent but not outstanding profile across the board.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across most aspects. Student Life and Professors emerge as the highest-scoring areas, both receiving an average of 4.11. Value also scores highly at 4.11. The weakest area, however, is Accommodations, which receives the lowest rating at 3.79. Facilities and Location are rated moderately well, falling between 3.88 and 3.90.
A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings. The strongest aspects are the **Location** (3.89) and **Internationality/Value** (both 3.79), suggesting a desirable and globally recognized institution with good perceived worth. **Student Life** (2.67) received the lowest score, pointing to an area that could be improved. Other areas like Professors, Facilities, and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
This university receives excellent marks for its **facilities**, earning a remarkable 4.7 out of 5. Other strong areas include **value** (4.6) and **location** and **internationality** (both 4.4). **Professors** and **student life** are also well-regarded, scoring 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The primary area for improvement is **accommodation**, which received a lower rating of 3.
This university garners excellent feedback, particularly in its **location**, which received the highest score. Professors and facilities also earned strong marks. While overall student life and internationality are well-regarded, **accommodation** stands out as the area with the lowest, though still positive, rating. The value proposition is considered perfect.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieves a perfect score of 5 in every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value. This indicates a consistently outstanding experience for students in all surveyed areas, with no single category performing weaker than others.
Approximately 65% of reviews are positive, highlighting valuable skills, multicultural environments, and expert tutors. A smaller portion, around 13%, expresses concerns regarding class depth and administrative responsiveness.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Positive feedback (~96%) highlights strong academics, knowledgeable professors, and a vibrant international environment. A small minority (~4%) mentions issues with aging facilities, disconnected campus culture, and outdated teaching methods.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting a robust virtual campus, flexible online model, and continuous assessment. A small percentage (~10%) of negative feedback mentions administrative errors and poor customer service.
With an average rating of 4/5 from 7 reviews, students praise diverse learning opportunities and the practical, project-based approach. Teachers are highly regarded for their professional expertise. Negative feedback is minimal.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.78/5. Students highly recommend ENEB for its flexibility, comprehensive curriculum, and valuable additional courses.
All 6 reviews were positive, giving an average of 5/5 stars. Students highlighted the program's blend of marketing, psychology, and neuroscience, and found classes engaging and practical. Professors were professional and supportive.
I am deeply disappointed with my experience at EAE Business School. I regret wasting both my time and money on this institution, and I feel compelled to share my experience to help others avoid making the same mistake. First and foremost, it is evident that students' concerns and issues are not a priority for EAE. The administration's lack of response and follow-up on critical matters is appalling. I have had to chase them multiple times for essential documents, and even then, they failed to deliver. For instance, I needed an academic confirmation for my visa renewal. Despite my persistent efforts and numerous emails, I have yet to receive this crucial document. Their standard response is a simple "okay," but no real action is taken, leaving students in limbo. Academically, the situation is equally disheartening. Although I was enrolled in an English-taught program, I can confidently say that at least 90% of the professors lacked proficiency in English. Their inability to communicate effectively and convey the course material was a significant barrier to learning. Moreover, it seemed that many of the instructors lacked the necessary knowledge and expertise in their respective fields. It appears that the hiring standards at EAE do not prioritize the academic qualifications or language skills of their faculty, which severely undermines the quality of education provided. The overall environment at EAE feels more like a daycare center than a reputable business school. The lack of professionalism, coupled with inadequate academic support, makes it clear that the institution does not take the education of its students seriously. The administration's disregard for students' needs and the subpar teaching quality make it impossible to recommend this school to anyone. In conclusion, attending EAE Business School has been a colossal waste of time and money. If you value your time, money, and education, I strongly advise you to look elsewhere. Do not make the mistake of enrolling in this institution.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Honestly, I didn't attend class that often, so my connection to the university was more practical than emotional. I appreciated the resources, but I felt disconnected from campus culture. In hindsight, I'd have engaged more, but I also believe that university should facilitate more digital resources and support for those who, for whatever reason, can't always attend in person.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
I really enjoy the program because of the projects, at IED we don’t have too many theory classes instead we do projects. It’s very interesting because it allows me to be creative while also changing my perspective on design. The university has very nice and good teachers and we have access to very modern equipment.
I highly recommend the Master’s in Project Management course at ENEB for anyone considering a career in this field. The course is entirely online, making it convenient for those with busy schedules, and it includes valuable additional courses like Business English and specialized modules from Harvard Business School. The quality of the material is veri high and very comprehensive, providing a strong foundation for beginner project managers or those who are just starting to explore this field. It’s also well-suited for small business owners looking to develop strategic planning skills. Overall, a great choice for gaining practical, applicable knowledge in project management!
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
