University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB vs NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs POLIMI Graduate School of Management vs SDA Bocconi School of Management vs Istituto Italiano Fotografia - IIF

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR (4.90)
University of Milano-Bicocca - UNIMIB: wins 0/7 categories
NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts: wins 1/7 categories
POLIMI Graduate School of Management: wins 2/7 categories
SDA Bocconi School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Istituto Italiano Fotografia - IIF: wins 0/7 categories
Milano Fashion Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Art Management
Best programme: Finance
Best programme: School of Arts and Sciences
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Category ratings
Facilities
3.64
4.33
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.57
Win
Location
3.77
4.33
Win
4.00
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
4.29
Professors
3.40
4.33
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.86
Win
Internationality
3.05
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.43
Student life
3.59
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.50
Not rated
4.43
Value
3.63
4.33
4.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
3.50
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
4.17
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent academic environment and qualified professors
  • +Well-organized facilities and supportive student life
  • +Opportunities for interaction and personal growth
  • +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
  • +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
  • +Innovative and forward-looking curriculum
  • +Strong career development and industry connections
  • +Flexible and student-friendly learning environment

Nothing to show

  • +Immersive, engaging learning experience
  • +Positive staff and facility interactions
  • +Well-balanced curriculum

Nothing to show

  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Lack of personal attention and feeling like a number
  • -Concerns about professor qualifications
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Excessive administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of practical application and unclear curriculum.

Nothing to show

  • -High costs and insufficient equipment.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

This university scores strongest in **Location**, receiving a rating of 3.77. **Facilities** and **Value** also perform well, both hovering around 3.63. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area, with a rating of 2.99, closely followed by **Internationality** at 3.05. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** fall in the mid-range, indicating a more mixed student experience.

This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.

The university scores exceptionally well in Student Life and Internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Its Facilities and Value also stand out with strong ratings of 4.5. Professors and Location are solid at 4.0. The lowest-rated area is Accomodation, with a score of 3.5. This indicates a positive overall experience, particularly for social engagement and global integration.

Nothing to show

This institution presents a solid, albeit moderate, overall performance. Its strongest aspects include Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all receiving a respectable rating of 3. However, its weakest areas are Location and Student Life, both scoring a lower 2.5, suggesting these might be points for improvement or considerations for prospective students.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university is praised for its modern campus, facilities, and international environment by ~74% of reviewers. Some mention intensive schedules. One reviewer noted poor organization and feeling like a number.

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.

All reviews are positive, with students praising the program's focus on finance technology, career prospects, and the supportive, organized learning environment. The university is described as flexible and student-friendly.

Nothing to show

Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average rating. One review praises the immersive and positive experience, while the other criticizes high costs and insufficient equipment, representing ~50% of feedback.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

Rating distribution
5★
19%
38%
33%
0%
50%
0%
86%
4★
52%
63%
67%
0%
0%
0%
14%
3★
26%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Bicocca Sociology

I am following the degree course in Sociology. I'm really happy with how I'm finding myself at this university. I think the professors are very good and available in giving any kind of information. Very active university life with numerous initiatives. Clean and sunny environment. I highly recommend it.

Graphic Design

I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.

Great technology competences related to the financial world

The program offers great technological and concrete competencies of the technology applied to the financial sector. Students are highly motivated and fun to be around. The courses are highly linked to innovative and forward-looking topics and deliver great career prospects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close