University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA

Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University Stefan cel Mare Suceava (4.70)
University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB: wins 0/6 categories
The Bucharest University of Economic Studies - ASE Bucuresti: wins 0/6 categories
Romanian-American University: wins 0/6 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA: wins 1/6 categories
University Stefan cel Mare Suceava: wins 5/6 categories
Tiffin University Bucharest: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Maths
Best programme: Cybernetics
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Banking and Finance
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.31
3.85
4.00
Not rated
4.80
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.66
3.83
Not rated
4.83
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.61
3.91
4.17
Not rated
4.00
4.67
Win
Not rated
Internationality
3.50
3.84
4.33
Not rated
3.83
4.33
Not rated
Student life
3.94
4.45
4.00
Not rated
4.50
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
3.73
4.04
4.00
Not rated
4.83
Win
4.67
Not rated
Accommodation
3.16
4.09
3.83
Not rated
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
  • +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
  • +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
  • +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
  • +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
  • +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
  • +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Relevant and enriching programmes
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
  • +Practical, relevant learning
  • +Strong academic reputation and research

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
  • -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
  • -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
  • -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
  • -Students find administrative and management issues frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant course content is a common issue.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.

The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.

This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.

Nothing to show

This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.

This institution garners outstanding marks in key areas, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation. Its professors and overall value are also highly regarded, both receiving ratings of approximately 4.67. The university's internationality stands out as its comparatively weakest area, though still strong at 4.33.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.

~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.

With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.

Nothing to show

With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, students express strong satisfaction. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights excellent professors and valuable education, with many finding it a great choice for academic and career success.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
24%
44%
50%
0%
50%
67%
0%
4★
40%
36%
33%
0%
50%
33%
0%
3★
30%
18%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
2%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My professors

My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.

Useful Programme with Room to Improve

Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best Romanian University

Being part of USV was amazing. Studying what I liked while also being home was extremely nice and most of the teachers were very keen to teach you everything they knew. Even today I am using at work what I learnt at university.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close