IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 625 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Vibrant student life and positive campus experience
- +International environment and engaging professors
- +Strong academic programs and modern facilities
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +International environment and diverse student community
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world business application
- +Extensive international exposure and global campus options
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Practical, international learning experiences and opportunities abroad
- +High-quality teaching from experienced professionals and professors
- +Multicultural environment and strong alumni network
- +Practical skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and diverse learning environment
- +Quality teaching and relevant curriculum
- +Welcoming international community & diverse backgrounds
- +Interactive flipped classroom & engaging discussions
- +Approachable professors & personal development focus
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Concerns exist regarding the academic quality and professor engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication, exam, and results management.
- -Concerns about teaching faculty and a perception of education being treated as a business.
- -Lack of student guidance and support for career goals.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Academic content lacks depth and practical application.
- -Tuition costs are perceived as too high for the quality of education.
- -The school's offerings do not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
Internationality and Student Life emerge as the university's strongest points, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Location also scores highly. Conversely, Accommodations represent the weakest area with a rating of 3.92. Facilities and Professors are rated moderately well, while Value stands out as a strong performer at 4.31.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Strengths lie in **Internationality**, rated highest at 4.44, followed closely by **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.33). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.25) also received strong scores. The primary area for improvement is **Accomodation**, with the lowest rating of 3.70. **Value** sits at a respectable 4.10.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a very positive rating. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a score of 3.67. **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated respectably, with **Value** also falling within a similar range.
This institution garners high marks for its **location** and **internationality**, both scoring over 4.5. **Professors** and **student life** also received strong ratings of 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation**, with a score of 3.18, and **facilities**, at 3.52. **Value** sits in the mid-range at 3.74.
Overall, the university receives strong marks across various aspects. Professors and location are particularly lauded, achieving the highest scores. Student life and internationality also perform well. While accommodation is rated slightly lower, the university demonstrates a solid standing in facilities and value, with no significantly weak areas identified.
With an average rating of 4.38/5 and 234 positive reviews (approximately 91%), students highly recommend the university for its engaging programs, international environment, and vibrant student life. Very limited negative feedback (approximately 0.8%) exists.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
With a 4.37 average rating from 179 reviews, approximately 90% are positive, highlighting a rewarding and transformative experience with academic knowledge, practical learning, and international exposure. A small percentage (~2.2%) of negative feedback cited management issues and poor communication.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
Most reviews (~81%) are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and cultural diversity. A small percentage (~4.3%) of reviews express disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.92/5, students praise skill development, professional preparation, and a supportive atmosphere. Limited negative feedback exists.
Students report a highly positive experience (~100%), highlighting the welcoming international community and engaging, interactive teaching methods. Professors are approachable, and opportunities like double degrees are appreciated. No negative feedback was recorded.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
