SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 238 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging curriculum and exceptional teaching quality
- +International opportunities and diverse student body
- +Practical learning and active campus life
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Vibrant student life and diverse activities
- +Practical, real-world focused education and international opportunities
- +Strong career support and professional preparation
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Supportive environment and vibrant student life
- +Approachable and supportive professors
- +Practical learning and real-world experience
- +International environment and personal development
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result management.
- -Lack of student support and guidance for career development.
- -Concerns about faculty professionalism and a perceived focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses and teachers
- -Poor value for money
- -Lack of student engagement and motivation
- -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
- -Inconsistent and poor quality teaching negatively impacts learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of communication and support from the institution is prevalent.
This institution generally receives positive evaluations, with professors earning the highest marks at 4.40. Other strong areas include internationality (4.37) and location (4.23). Student life and facilities also score well, above 4.0. The weakest area is accommodation, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.56. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across most aspects of the student experience.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Perceived strengths of the university lie prominently in its location and student life, both scoring above 4.2. Professors also received a strong rating. The weakest areas identified were facilities and accommodation, with scores below 3.8. Internationality and value for money were rated moderately well, falling between 3.8 and 4.
This institution garners excellent scores for its **location** (4.625) and **internationality** (4.5625), alongside a robust rating for **student life** (4.0625). Conversely, **accommodation** presents the most significant area for improvement, rated at 2.6875. Ratings for facilities, professors, and value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but uneven performance across surveyed aspects.
Receiving perfect scores across the board, this institution excels in all evaluated aspects. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated as outstanding. With a consistent five-star performance across every category, there are no discernible weak areas to highlight. The university demonstrates a uniformly strong offering.
With a 4.35/5 average from 140 reviews, ~93% praise excellent academics, international mobility, and student life. A small ~3% of feedback noted issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Around 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, engaging classes, and enjoyable campus life. A small portion (~6%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching staff.
With a ~67% positive sentiment, students praise personalized career support, excellent pedagogy focused on group work and professional integration, and practical experiences. Some mention note wait times and administrative disorganization.
Both reviews are overwhelmingly positive, rating the university 5/5. Students praise the program's fulfillment of expectations, approachable professors, practical learning, and strong industry connections. The international environment and focus on personal development are also highlighted.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!
