emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 378 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +International environment and diverse student community
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world business application
- +Extensive international exposure and global campus options
- +Strong professors and diverse international student community.
- +Excellent facilities and good class scheduling.
- +Beneficial business programs and city amenities.
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Practical, international learning experiences and opportunities abroad
- +High-quality teaching from experienced professionals and professors
- +Multicultural environment and strong alumni network
- +Practical skill development and career preparation
- +Supportive and diverse learning environment
- +Quality teaching and relevant curriculum
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Personal growth and skill development
- +Career advancement and practical relevance
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication, exam, and results management.
- -Concerns about teaching faculty and a perception of education being treated as a business.
- -Lack of student guidance and support for career goals.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of practical tools.
- -Disengaged professors unwilling to accept feedback.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Academic content lacks depth and practical application.
- -Tuition costs are perceived as too high for the quality of education.
- -The school's offerings do not align with student expectations or career goals.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a common complaint.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a common complaint.
- -A lack of administrative support and poor communication causes frustration.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized as being below expectations.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Strengths lie in **Internationality**, rated highest at 4.44, followed closely by **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.33). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.25) also received strong scores. The primary area for improvement is **Accomodation**, with the lowest rating of 3.70. **Value** sits at a respectable 4.10.
This institution demonstrates strong internationality, achieving its highest rating in this area. Professors are also highly regarded. While most categories received positive feedback, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its global appeal and academic staff.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Student Life** also received a very positive rating. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a score of 3.67. **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated respectably, with **Value** also falling within a similar range.
This institution garners high marks for its **location** and **internationality**, both scoring over 4.5. **Professors** and **student life** also received strong ratings of 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation**, with a score of 3.18, and **facilities**, at 3.52. **Value** sits in the mid-range at 3.74.
This institution garners very strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Exceptional scores were awarded for Professors (4.86) and Internationality (4.71). Facilities and Student Life also received high marks (4.6 each). The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 3.75. Value and Location received solid, though not top-tier, scores.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With a 4.37 average rating from 179 reviews, approximately 90% are positive, highlighting a rewarding and transformative experience with academic knowledge, practical learning, and international exposure. A small percentage (~2.2%) of negative feedback cited management issues and poor communication.
The vast majority of university reviews are positive, praising the learning environment, facilities, and diverse international community. A small percentage of feedback expresses disappointment with practical training and professor engagement.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
Most reviews (~81%) are positive, highlighting international opportunities, practical learning, and cultural diversity. A small percentage (~4.3%) of reviews express disappointment with academic depth and course relevance.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 3.92/5, students praise skill development, professional preparation, and a supportive atmosphere. Limited negative feedback exists.
All 7 reviews are positive, averaging 4.57/5. Students highlight academic excellence, intellectual rigor, a human learning experience, and career advancement. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
Nothing to show
