Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Buckinghamshire New University - Bucks New Uni vs Hofstra University vs Saint Mary's College of California

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE (4.50)
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 2/7 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 3/7 categories
Buckinghamshire New University - Bucks New Uni: wins 0/7 categories
Hofstra University: wins 2/7 categories
Saint Mary's College of California: wins 0/7 categories
Samara State Medical University - SamSMU: wins 0/7 categories
ITESO, Universidad Jesuita de Gualadajara: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Buckinghamshire, The United Kingdom
4.00
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Nursing
Long Island, New York, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Journalism
Moraga, California, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
Win
4.14
4.11
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.95
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.10
4.33
4.61
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.50
4.18
4.17
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.75
Win
4.10
4.24
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.20
4.48
Win
4.11
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.93
3.99
Win
3.82
2.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Supportive and accessible staff
  • +Engaging and challenging academic programs
  • +Positive learning environment and community
  • +Diverse, practical skill development in communications
  • +Effective COVID-19 response

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are frequent frustrations.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and irrelevant curriculum content are disliked.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations are prevalent.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Professors at this institution are exceptionally well-regarded, earning a high rating. Student life and internationality also received positive scores, reflecting well on these aspects. While generally favorable, accommodation stands out as the area with the lowest rating. Facilities and value for money are also rated competently.

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings and global engagement, reflected in perfect scores for Professors and Internationality. Facilities and location also receive favorable marks. Conversely, Accommodation presents a notable weakness, scoring the lowest. Student Life is rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement in those areas to match the university's otherwise impressive profile.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

Approximately 100% of reviews are positive, with students highlighting friendly, supportive staff and engaging academic experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 4/5 average rating, one review highlights a positive experience, particularly with the School of Communications' diverse skill development. There is minimal negative feedback.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
38%
65%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
22%
79%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
13%
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close