WHU - Otto Beisheim School of Management vs CBS International Business School - CBS vs Kühne Logistics University - KLU vs University of Erlangen-Nuremberg - FAU vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 71 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent faculty and practical learning experiences
- +International exposure and real-world business cases
- +Engaging program with opportunities for skill development and creativity
- +Practical, experience-based learning and engaging professors.
- +Supportive staff and interactive, interesting classes.
- +Opportunities for cultural immersion and international connections.
- +Supportive people and approachable professors
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences
- +Strong networking and international community
- +Depth of knowledge and practical application
- +Wide course selection and personalized study paths
- +Supportive academic environment and modern curriculum
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
Nothing to show
- +Strong technology, entrepreneurship, and innovation focus
- +Small classes and personal lecturer/staff experience
- +Excellent value for money and career/life start opportunities
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Facilities are described as terrible and outdated.
- -Lack of genuine help and feeling exploited for money are recurring themes.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Administrative issues, including poor communication and disorganized processes, are a major source of frustration.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in the curriculum disappoints students.
- -Lack of adequate student support and careless supervision.
- -Poor organization of university departments and majors.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and course organization leads to confusion.
Overall, this university garners very positive feedback. Its strongest aspects include excellent Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring a high 4.5. Value is also rated highly at 4.5. Areas with slightly lower scores are Student Life and Internationality, both at 3.5. Accommodations received a solid 4.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas, with **Professors, Student Life, and Internationality** all receiving top marks, closely followed by Facilities. The university's **Accommodation** emerges as its weakest point, scoring notably lower than other aspects. Value for money is also rated positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a university excelling in several key aspects. Its location stands out with an impressive score of 4.89, closely followed by strong performance in internationality (4.8), facilities (4.6), student life (4.6), and professors (4.65). However, accommodation presents a clear area for improvement, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, while value remains solid at 4.55.
Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Top marks were achieved in the quality of professors and its international student presence, both receiving a 4.4 rating. Facilities and accommodation also scored highly at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively, with location also at 4.2. The area receiving the lowest score, indicating potential for improvement, is student life, which registered at 3.2. Value for money is rated favorably at 4.2.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for Professors and Accomodation, and near-perfect ratings for Facilities and Student Life. Its strongest aspects clearly lie in the academic and living experiences offered. Conversely, the university's Internationality and Value for money received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating areas where there is room for improvement.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (100% positive reviews) with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight experienced professors, a strong mix of theory and practical application, and enjoyable staff and fellow students.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 22 reviews, ~82% are positive, praising project-based learning, professors' real-world experience, and student interactions. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentioned issues with office support and perceived cost-driven practices.
With an average rating of 4.76/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight supportive professors, a personal learning environment with small classes, and practical, real-world experiences. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 3.83/5 from six reviews, ~50% praised its strong curriculum and academic rigor, while ~17% cited issues with student support and supervision.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Nothing to show
All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship, small class sizes, and a positive learning experience. No negative feedback was provided.
Amazing program, it provides the perfect blend and opportunity to learn skills and also explore your creativity. Most professors are very experienced and well known within their field of expertise. Some are outstanding and provide you with great knowledge. There is a lot of emphases given to practical learning and group projects. WHU staff, as well as students, were good fun.
I've had a good experience so far while I've been studying at CBS. However, the majority of students are of German nationality, while there are also students from other nations. If you're feeling under the weather or don't feel like going to school, they provide a blended learning option that allows you to stay at home and participate in the class simultaneously online. The campus in Cologne is not particularly cutting-edge, but I've heard that the campus in Mainz is more or less cutting-edge and attractive. The instructors and departmental officials are all cordial. The School encourages pupils to participate in a variety of sports because it values a healthy balance between work and recreation. As a result of CBS's partnerships with various significant businesses, the School is able to maintain its curricula current with the needs of the modern business world. Additionally, partnerships allow CBS to give its students greater options for internships and professional experience. By participating in business projects in collaboration with well-known companies, students can also gain important information and skills.
My experience at KLU has truly been life-changing. This university has given me a second chance and opened the door to a completely new life filled with opportunities. From the very beginning, it has felt like a second home. What makes KLU so special is the people. Every single person here is supportive and genuinely willing to help. The professors are not only highly qualified and professional, but also approachable and always ready to guide you in any academic or professional matter. I have never been in a place like this before. The strong connection with industry, the quality of events, and the incredible network of classmates and alumni create the perfect environment for both personal and professional growth. I will always be grateful to KLU for everything I have experienced here.
I completed my M.Sc. in Medical Engineering at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, and overall it has been a very valuable and enriching experience. The program offers a strong combination of engineering, medical imaging, and data-driven methods. Courses such as MRI, biomedical signal processing, and machine learning provided both theoretical depth and practical exposure. I especially appreciated the balance between physics-based understanding and modern AI techniques. One of the highlights of my studies was the opportunity to work on a hands-on thesis project involving intuitive robot control using EMG and IMU signals. This allowed me to apply concepts like signal processing, machine learning, and robotics control (e.g., Cartesian control and simulation using MuJoCo) to a real-world problem. The university provides good research opportunities, and institutes like AIROB/FAPS offer exposure to cutting-edge robotics and automation projects. Collaboration between disciplines is also a strong point. However, some courses can be quite theoretical, and students may need to take extra initiative to gain more practical or industry-oriented experience. Additionally, navigating administrative processes can sometimes be slow. Overall, I would definitely recommend this program to students interested in medical imaging, biomedical signal processing, robotics, or AI in healthcare. It provides a solid foundation for both research and industry careers.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Excellent small school with a strong focus on technology and entrepreneurship; small classes; personal experience with lecturers and staff; well-designed curriculum; good lectures and interesting guest lecturers; a lot of traveling if you don't live in Hamburg's south, but manageable for three semesters; excellent value for money compared to UK/US schools, even without receiving one of the many scholarships; financial breakeven in less than two years; well-known in northern Germany, but now more so in central Europe; each class has one or two larger successful startups, with founders frequently giving lectures on campus; the alumni network feels more like a family than a pure "business network"; the new CEO is driving growth; and there are plenty of opportunities and support provided for extracurricular activities, initiatives, etc.
