Erasmus Hogeschool Brussel - EHB vs EIT Digital Master School vs Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management vs Institut des hautes études des communications sociales - IHEC vs ICHEC Brussels Management School
Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inclusive community and support for diverse students
- +High-quality teaching and artistic focus
- +Vibrant student life and cultural enrichment
Nothing to show
- +Strong economics and business programs
- +Supportive faculty and rigorous academics
- +Excellent networking and location
- +Strong practical and professional focus
- +High quality, relevant course content and diverse specializations
- +Connection to the professional world and competent instructors
- +Accessible professors with real-world expertise
- +Numerous international opportunities and travel options
- +Broad range of enriching courses and programs
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support create dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
A varied profile emerges from these university ratings, with its strongest areas being **Internationality** (4.175) and **Location** (4.15). **Facilities** (3.833) and **Professors** (3.825) also received commendable scores. On the other hand, **Student Life** (3.225) and **Accomodation** (3.375) represent areas with the lowest reported satisfaction, while **Value** (3.725) falls in the mid-range.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and both accommodation and internationality also score highly with 4.5. The university's facilities are rated at a respectable 4, representing the lowest score among the evaluated aspects.
This institution presents a generally positive profile. Its strongest aspects are the **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, rated at 3. The university also scores a respectable 3.5 in **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a solid, well-rounded experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Internationality**, receiving a score of 4.33, and in **Value**, rated at 4.17. Its **Professors** are also well-regarded with a score of 4. The weakest area appears to be **Facilities**, which earned a rating of 3.33, matching **Student Life**. Other aspects like **Location** and **Accommodation** fall within a moderate range.
Nothing to show
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Three out of five reviews are positive (60%). Students highlight financial and community resources, classroom experience, and cultural diversity as strengths. One review mentioned building infrastructure could be improved.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive, highlighting strong academics and networking. Reviews commend knowledgeable faculty and rigorous coursework, though workload can be demanding.
With 100% positive feedback, students praise the university's practical, professional focus and strong connection to the industry. They highlight hands-on learning, project-based work, and competent instructors.
With ~83% positive feedback, students praise the university's enriching programs and international outlook. They highlight opportunities for travel and internships, alongside approachable professors and strong language classes. Minimal negative feedback exists.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.