NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts vs LUISS Business School vs Rome Business School vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Roma Tre - uniroma3

Side-by-side comparison from 135 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
NABA – New Academy of Fine Arts: wins 0/7 categories
LUISS Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Rome Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/7 categories
Roma Tre - uniroma3: wins 0/7 categories
Guglielmo Marconi University: wins 0/7 categories
European School of Economics - ESE: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Art Management
Best programme: Luxury Brand Management
Best programme: Arts and Culture Management
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Digital Marketing
London, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
39 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.33
4.17
4.16
4.67
Win
3.89
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.33
4.58
4.61
5.00
Win
4.11
Not rated
4.79
Professors
4.33
3.33
4.48
Win
4.33
4.11
4.00
4.44
Internationality
4.67
3.58
4.76
5.00
Win
3.39
2.00
4.51
Student life
4.00
3.25
4.23
4.33
3.78
Not rated
4.43
Win
Value
4.33
3.17
4.35
5.00
Win
3.89
4.00
4.31
Accommodation
4.00
2.92
3.76
5.00
Win
3.41
Not rated
4.11
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Outstanding teachers and a supportive, family-like community.
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth in a well-resourced environment.
  • +An international atmosphere with diverse student interactions.
  • +Strong career focus and job market alignment
  • +Caring professors and engaging learning experiences
  • +International environment and practical application
  • +Industry connections and real-world application opportunities
  • +Insightful and professionally active faculty
  • +Diverse and global learning environment
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Engaging professors and academic excellence
  • +Supportive campus services and resources
  • +Practical learning experiences and internships
  • +Relevant and in-depth subject matter
  • +Competent and knowledgeable professors
  • +Convenient telematics access
  • +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
  • +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
  • +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and lack of support, are frequently criticized.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and a lack of individual attention negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Poor organization and low-level course content.
  • -Ineffective student coordination and support.
  • -Lack of planning and poor execution of program elements.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
  • -Course content and offerings do not meet expectations.
  • -Lack of support and professionalism from staff is a recurring theme.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
  • -Inflexible and poorly communicated academic policies frustrate students.
  • -Limited career services and support hinder post-graduation prospects.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
  • -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Internationality**, with a rating of 4.67. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value are also highly rated, each scoring 4.33. Student Life and Accomodation are solid, both receiving a score of 4.

This university is distinguished by exceptional ratings in its **Location**, scoring an impressive 4.58. Its **Facilities** also received a strong evaluation at 4.17. Conversely, the university's weakest areas are **Accomodation**, rated at 2.92, and **Student Life**, with a score of 3.25. **Professors** and **Value** are moderately rated, while **Internationality** sits at a decent 3.58.

An analysis of university ratings reveals exceptional strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both scoring above 4.6. **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive favorable marks, indicating positive academic and social environments. **Facilities** and **Value** are well-regarded, though slightly lower than the top-tier categories. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, suggesting it may be a point for improvement.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

The university garners praise in several key areas, with professors and location both receiving the highest marks. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present the weakest aspects, scoring lower than other categories. The overall value proposition is rated positively, reflecting a balanced but uneven performance.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its academic offerings, with high ratings for Professors and Value. Conversely, several core areas require substantial improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accomodation all received zero ratings, indicating considerable deficiencies. Internationality presents a moderate but still underdeveloped aspect, with a rating of two.

Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.38/5. Students consistently praise outstanding teachers, a supportive environment with compassionate individuals, and abundant resources, fostering personal growth and strong connections.

With 5 out of 12 reviews being positive, students highlight smooth admissions, well-organized programs aligned with the job market, and an international environment. One review mentioned organizational gaps and a need for more versatile examples.

~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, valuable industry connections, and insightful professors. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with diploma delivery, unprofessionalism, and unmet expectations.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~78% of 18 reviews are positive. Students commend professors' competence and teaching, engaging course content, and organized campus services. A small portion of feedback notes a theoretical approach in some fields.

With a 4/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Students highlight well-suited second-year subjects, particularly in marketing and computer science, taught by competent professors.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
8%
67%
100%
56%
0%
59%
4★
63%
33%
20%
0%
22%
100%
36%
3★
0%
50%
6%
0%
22%
0%
5%
2★
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Graphic Design

I liked the ambiant, the friendly people, professional professors, the care of details. I had the opportunity to improve myself and find out more about me, my skills and what I'm looking for in a job.

Very basic courses

The first half of the year the program is very basic, this is done in hopes of having all students with the same base knowledge but unfortunately, students with a business/economics background have no engagement or academic challenge as these courses cover the introduction of management courses very briefly.

RBS Business Simulation Game Experience.

Participating in the Business Simulation Game as part of my MBA at Rome Business School was one of the most practical and impactful experiences of the program, It provided a realistic environment to test strategic decision making under pressure and highlighted the strong interdependence between market dynamics, operational performance, cost discipline, people management, pricing strategy and profitability.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The amazing professors/teachers there!

First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close