IÉSEG School of Management vs Université d'Orléans vs SKEMA Business School vs Excelia Business School vs Polytech Orléans
Side-by-side comparison from 474 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Diverse programs and experienced, friendly professors
- +Affordable tuition and living costs
- +Accessible campus and convenient facilities
- +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
- +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
- +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
- +High-quality teaching from professors and speakers
- +International environment and student diversity
- +Practical curriculum and preparation for professional challenges
Nothing to show
- +Professionalization and diverse opportunities in computer science
- +Supportive learning environment and personalized pace
- +Mobility and flexible learning formats
Nothing to show
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or uninspired.
- -Poor management and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance.
- -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
- -Superficial academic content lacking depth and practical value
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient internship/apprenticeship support
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or desired specializations
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This university shows particular strength in accommodation and internationality, both scoring a high 4.3. Other well-regarded areas include facilities, professors, and location, all at 3.8. Student life represents the weakest area with a score of 3.45, though the overall value remains solid at 3.7.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Internationality, closely followed by Student Life and Location, all receiving high scores above 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest category, with the lowest rating of 3.61. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating areas of consistent, good performance.
Nothing to show
This institution receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Its strengths lie in its prime location, vibrant student life, excellent accommodation options, strong international focus, and exceptional value for money, all scoring a perfect five. The weakest area, with a rating of three, is the performance of its professors. Facilities are also highly rated at a four.
Nothing to show
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
With a 4/5 average rating from 17 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise diverse programs and reasonable fees, experienced and friendly professors, and affordable student living.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.
Most reviews are positive (~86%), praising teaching quality, cultural diversity, and modern infrastructure. A small number (~5%) mention superficial subject coverage or lack of practical value.
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive sentiment, student reviews highlight ample professional opportunities in computer science and a supportive campus atmosphere. The curriculum effectively fosters professionalization and knowledge diversification.
Nothing to show
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
I found that the environment is very adaptable and super friendly The Master LAME courses were really interesting and sometimes challenging. However, the language courses promised was not what expected. I hoped for way more especially the french language. Its was definitely not sufficient for someone who is a beginner or intermediate. The other challenge was to get an internship in English..Not easy at all..at all.. Last but not least, the amazing international environment filled with wonderful people from all walks of life.. This definitely made the journey worthwhile.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
