EU Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs MIB Trieste School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 412 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable staff and faculty
- +Practical, interactive learning with strong career focus
- +Welcoming community and international environment
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Engaging and experienced faculty
- +Diverse and supportive student community
- +Well-structured and effective academic programs
- +Engaging, real-world application, and interdisciplinary learning
- +Knowledgeable and approachable professors
- +Stimulating academic environment with extracurricular activities
- +Expert professors, practical curriculum, and networking opportunities.
- +Supportive community and career integration support.
- +Beautiful location and enriching overall experience.
- +Practical, real-world preparation
- +Personal and professional growth
- +International experience
- +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
- +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization.
- -Educational quality is perceived as basic and lacking proper support.
- -Facilities and extracurriculars are underdeveloped and not prioritized.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
- -Administrative and organizational issues, including poor communication and problem-solving.
- -Lack of program structure, insufficient depth, and overlapping course content.
- -Limited practical guidance on career opportunities and skill acquisition.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support for students are recurring complaints.
- -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.7. Student life is also highly regarded at 4.2. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 3.4. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, generally above 3.8.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across several key areas. Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by location and value. Student life also receives a favorable score. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest rating. Facilities also scored moderately.
This institution achieves strong overall scores, with location and student life standing out as particularly well-regarded areas. The university also garners high marks for its professors and value for money. Among the evaluated aspects, accommodation received the lowest, though still respectable, rating. Internationality and facilities also scored favorably.
This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.
This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting career services, supportive staff, and an international environment. About 7.4% are negative, citing disorganization and basic education.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable professors, relevant interdisciplinary courses, and engaging learning experiences. A small percentage (~7.4%) of negative feedback mentioned issues with organization and professor responsiveness.
All 42 student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.81/5. Students praise knowledgeable professors, practical curriculum, and excellent networking opportunities. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.
The program at MIB Trieste School of Management allowed me to acquire solid management skills in an international context. The courses are well-structured, focused on practice and group projects. I particularly appreciated the cultural diversity and the interaction with students from all over the world. I recommend this school to those looking for an enriching and professional learning experience. The organization could be improved at times, but overall, the experience was very positive.
Nothing to show
I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .
