King's College London vs London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Surrey vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Surrey Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 816 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and strong academic programs
- +Vibrant student life and diverse international community
- +Central location and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Expert and experienced faculty
- +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
- +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
- +Knowledgeable and helpful tutors/professors
- +Accessible online course materials and study resources
- +Positive campus environment and social opportunities
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Strong academic programmes and career support
- +Supportive and connected community
- +Excellent employability outcomes and internship opportunities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +Practical, industry-focused education and connections
- +Diverse contemporary music programs and courses
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -High tuition fees do not seem to be reflected in the quality of education or facilities.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
- -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
- -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Policies and favoritism disadvantage non-Chinese students.
- -Negative campus culture and corruption are prevalent.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning opportunities.
- -Limited career support and industry connections fail to prepare graduates.
This institution excels in its **Location**, boasting a near-perfect score. Internationality is also a significant strength, reflecting a diverse and globally-minded environment. However, **Accommodations** present the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the university demonstrates solid performance in facilities, professors, student life, and value, with a notable disparity between its strongest and weakest areas.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.
With ratings generally above 4.5, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths across its offerings. Facilities stand out as the highest-rated area, closely followed by Professors and Internationality. While Accommodation receives a strong score, it represents the relatively weakest area compared to other metrics, though still indicative of a positive experience.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution demonstrates a very strong performance across nearly all aspects, with particular excellence noted in Facilities, Location, Accommodation, and Internationality, all scoring exceptionally high. Student Life and Professors also receive commendable ratings. The weakest area, though still positive, is Value, indicating room for improvement in that specific domain compared to its other strengths.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
This institution shows a mixed performance according to recent ratings. Its strongest areas are **Student Life** (3.0), followed by **Internationality** (2.5). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.0) and **Value** (2.25) represent the weakest aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Location all received a middling 2.75.
With a 4.16 average rating from 237 reviews, ~99.6% of feedback is positive. Students praise versatile degrees, supportive professors, interesting courses, and vibrant, intellectually stimulating student life. A small amount of negative feedback noted some administrative slowness and curriculum focus.
Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (97%) praises knowledgeable staff, accessible online course content, and a great campus experience with social and study spaces. One negative review expressed concerns about university management and policies.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 25 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent programs, impactful professors, and strong career outcomes, including high employability. No negative feedback was recorded.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
University student reviews are mixed, with an average rating of 3/5. While one review is positive, another 25% expressed negative sentiment.
A top-ranking university. Best faculty/ staff and professors. I have gained tremendous amount of knowledge and skills during my 1 year master's program. As a result, I have grown academically, professionally and personally.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
I just saw this link on the Surrey alumnis page. I thought it was really cool to have the opportunity to share my experience. Congratulations Eduopinions for the work. I studied in Surrey a few years ago, I graduated in 2000 and I think the university has changed a lot since then. However, I can say that I loved studying in Surrey and that my daughter is now studying there too!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
