Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Forman Christian College vs University College Lahore vs University of South Asia - USA

Side-by-side comparison from 133 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD (5.00)
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 0/6 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 1/6 categories
Forman Christian College: wins 0/6 categories
University College Lahore: wins 0/6 categories
University of South Asia - USA: wins 5/6 categories
Beaconhouse National University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Lahore: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Business and Marketing
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Best programme: Health Science
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
4.50
4.29
4.00
4.69
Win
4.50
4.16
Location
4.50
4.00
4.63
3.50
4.80
Win
3.71
3.75
Professors
4.00
5.00
4.59
5.00
4.73
4.38
4.00
Internationality
3.60
4.00
4.06
4.50
4.55
Win
2.88
3.60
Student life
4.58
5.00
Win
4.59
3.50
4.67
4.63
4.11
Value
4.17
4.50
4.53
4.50
4.67
Win
4.13
3.90
Accommodation
3.76
4.00
3.75
4.00
4.62
Win
3.00
3.45
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Strong academic programs and supportive faculty.
  • +Lively campus life and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Emphasis on critical thinking and practical learning.
  • +Quality education and diverse programmes
  • +Supportive environment and extracurriculars
  • +Adequate resources for specific fields
  • +Supportive faculty and practical, skill-focused learning
  • +Positive campus atmosphere and environment
  • +Effective teaching tailored to student understanding
  • +Supportive and judgment-free faculty fostering practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus environment with diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Emphasis on academic growth and personal development opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and strong theoretical foundation
  • +Access to advanced labs and practical experience
  • +Good study environment and facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff was a problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Lack of resources and support significantly hinders learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods are a significant concern.
  • -Poor facilities and maintenance, including non-functional amenities, are disliked.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This institution receives particularly high marks in several key areas. Its location and professors are lauded as exceptionally strong points, closely followed by student life and value. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest rated aspect, while facilities and internationality also show room for improvement.

Performance across various university aspects reveals a strong academic focus, with professors receiving the highest rating of 5. Facilities and accommodation are well-regarded, both scoring 4, complemented by an excellent internationality score of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a rating of 4.5. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are location and student life, each rated at 3.5.

This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback from students, with its **Location** standing out as the highest-rated aspect. **Professors** also garnered exceptionally strong reviews. While still impressive, **Internationality** presented the lowest score among the evaluated categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently strong performance across all surveyed areas.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.5. Its professors and value for money also received solid ratings. However, accommodation and internationality are notable areas for improvement, with scores significantly lower than other categories. Location also received a moderate rating.

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11). **Professors** also garnered a respectable score of 4. Areas that could be improved include **Accomodation** (3.45) and **Internationality** (3.6). Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with some standout strengths.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising the strong academic reputation, supportive faculty, and lively campus. Approximately 0% of feedback expressed concerns.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, the university is highly praised. Reviews highlight quality education, diverse degree options, and various extracurricular activities. Engineering students specifically note adequate lab equipment and qualified faculty.

With a 4.86/5 average, virtually all (~100%) of 49 reviews are positive. Students praise the enriching experience, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and practical curriculum. The welcoming campus and vibrant atmosphere are also highlighted.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight positive academic growth, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and a vibrant campus environment with ample extracurricular activities.

Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive departments, research focus, and good study environments. A small portion (~10%) notes issues like outdated curriculum and poor facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
100%
71%
50%
88%
25%
35%
4★
31%
0%
24%
50%
10%
75%
40%
3★
11%
0%
6%
0%
2%
0%
15%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
10%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best Computer Science Department

This University has best computer science department they provide all facilities and the teachers are just so amazing. The campus life is fantastic. They have great societies for everything and have fascinating events.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close