BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Hanoi Metropolitan University - HNMU vs University of International Business and Economics - UIBE

Side-by-side comparison from 23 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (4.50)
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/6 categories
University of Bergen: wins 1/6 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 2/6 categories
Hanoi Metropolitan University - HNMU: wins 0/6 categories
University of International Business and Economics - UIBE: wins 2/6 categories
Kafr El-Sheikh University - KFS: wins 0/6 categories
Western Norway University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Biomedical Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: International Public Management
Best programme: International Trade and Finance
Best programme: Archaeology
Best programme: Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.00
4.71
Win
3.00
3.00
3.67
3.50
Location
4.50
4.33
4.14
4.00
5.00
Win
4.33
3.00
Professors
4.50
3.86
4.43
3.00
4.00
4.00
4.50
Internationality
4.00
4.00
4.43
2.00
5.00
Win
3.00
4.50
Student life
4.00
4.43
Win
4.29
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.50
Value
3.00
4.14
4.14
4.00
3.00
4.00
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.00
4.00
4.71
Win
3.00
3.00
3.33
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
  • +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
  • +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Limited campus conveniences and facility quality
  • +Curriculum content requires improvement
  • +Inconsistent professor professionalism and equity
  • +Diverse student body and English-taught programs
  • +Strong business and international trade focus
  • +Generous and welcoming community
  • +Strong practical training and skill development.
  • +Well-established programs and scientific subjects.
  • +Access to modern facilities and resources.
  • +Flexible online format and structure
  • +Career-focused and practical learning
  • +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
Cons
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
  • -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
  • -Inconsistent and unresponsive administrative support causes frustration.
  • -A lack of clear communication and transparency regarding policies and decisions is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective.
  • -Lack of clarity and organization in course structure and communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources for learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues causing frustration and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution presents a well-rounded academic experience. Its strongest aspects lie in its favorable **Location** and **Value**, both scoring a solid 4 out of 5. Areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** receive a respectable but average rating of 3. The weakest area, **Internationality**, falls to a 2, indicating room for improvement in global engagement or diversity.

This institution scores exceptionally well in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a perfect 5. Conversely, **Facilities**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are its weakest areas, each rated a moderate 3. **Professors** are a stronger suit, with a rating of 4.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.33. Professors and student life are also highly rated at 4.0. The weakest areas are **internationality** (3.0) and accommodation (3.33). Facilities score a respectable 3.67, with value also at 4.0.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

The single review is positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Feedback highlights a convenient campus, with some concerns about degraded facilities and the library. Curriculum and some unprofessional professors were noted.

The sole review highlights the university's diversity and English-taught programs, particularly for business and international trade majors. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4/5.

With ~67% positive feedback, reviewers praise the university for community, scientific subjects, practical training, and skill development for the job market. One review mentions access to modern facilities and resources.

With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
43%
29%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
100%
43%
57%
100%
100%
67%
50%
3★
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
33%
0%
2★
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close