Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Petrópolis Faculty of Medicine vs Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Side-by-side comparison from 165 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +Practical, skill-building programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive and interactive faculty and staff
- +Rich extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +Approachable and qualified faculty
- +Diverse project and internship opportunities
- +Beautiful campus environment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, concise programs
- +Relevant and up-to-date content
- +Strong foundational direction
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result mismanagement.
- -Concerns about financial focus over student well-being and discrimination.
- -Unorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent or poor quality of teaching and curriculum are common complaints.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and a lack of support create frustration.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -The curriculum lacks practical application and relevance to current industry needs.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
This university garners strong ratings across several key areas, with **Professors** and **Internationality** standing out as exceptional strengths. Students also appreciate the **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life**. The **Value** offering is also well-regarded. The **Accomodation** category received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, achieving a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** also receive solid marks, all rated at 4. A significant area for improvement, however, is **accommodation**, which received a considerably lower rating. **Internationality** and **value** present moderate scores, suggesting room for growth in these aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a generally moderate overall performance, the university's strengths lie in its **Professors**, receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** stand out as weaker areas, both rated at 2. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value all received a score of 3, indicating a more consistent, middle-ground performance in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
Around 97.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical skills, career development, and enriching international experiences. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, feedback highlights numerous project opportunities and approachable, qualified professors. Students also appreciate early internships.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university garners strong positive feedback, with its ~100% of positive reviews leading to an average rating of 4/5. Reviews highlight well-regarded programs, though some suggest a need for updated content in areas like AI.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
