McGill University vs Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs HEC Montreal vs John Abbott College vs Greystone College
Side-by-side comparison from 165 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and well-structured academic programs.
- +Dedicated and accessible professors.
- +Supportive and interactive learning environment.
- +Helpful professors and supportive staff
- +Strong marketing & business programs with useful real-world application
- +Vibrant student life and integration support
- +Diverse and well-rounded program offerings
- +Strong career preparation and job market focus
- +Engaging professors and ample student opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Effective teaching and supportive professors
- +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
- +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
- +Teaching excellence and faculty dedication
- +Interactive and engaging learning environment
- +Personalized attention and academic success
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Overcrowded classes and limited professor interaction.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of real-world application in courses.
- -Unrealistic workload and emphasis on memorization.
- -Lack of support and slow communication.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There is significant dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
- -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
- -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
University evaluations show a strong showing in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving particularly high scores. Student Life and Value also stand out positively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience, while Facilities and Professors are rated solidly in the upper range.
This university receives its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing also in Student Life and Value. Professors are rated well, as is Accomodation. Internationality and Facilities, while still solid, represent the areas with slightly lower scores in this assessment.
This university exhibits a strong performance across most surveyed areas. Student life stands out as its highest-rated aspect, closely followed by value and facilities. Accommodation and location, while still positive, represent the university's comparatively weaker areas, though all ratings remain robust. Internationality and professors also received favorable scores.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.
Overall, the university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance across most surveyed aspects. It received perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. The weakest area, while still positive, is Internationality, rated at a commendable 4. This suggests a highly desirable institution with outstanding offerings in nearly every dimension, with a slight opportunity for enhanced global engagement.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
The overwhelming majority of university students praise professors' dedication, well-structured and interactive courses, and abundant resources. A very small percentage mention overcrowded classes and a disconnect between some course content and real-world application.
Around 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, useful and interesting programs, and a supportive student environment. One negative review cited a lack of support.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 18 reviews, ~83% highlight diverse management and social programs, intimate class sizes with professor interaction, and numerous student events and scholarships. Some mention career focus and unique degree paths.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.
With a single review, this university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was entirely positive, highlighting teaching excellence and a dynamic learning environment.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
As a current student at McGill University, my experience has been incredibly rewarding both academically and personally. McGill is known for its strong international reputation, and it truly lives up to that with a diverse student body from around the world, which creates an exciting, global learning environment. The academic programs are challenging and research-driven, which pushes you to think critically and manage your time effectively. I’ve particularly appreciated the interdisciplinary opportunities, allowing me to combine Political Science, International Development, and South Asian Studies, and learn from professors who are passionate leaders in their fields. Beyond the classroom, campus life is vibrant, with countless clubs, events, and networking opportunities, plus the unique experience of living in Montréal, a city that balances culture, affordability, and excitement. If there’s one area for improvement, it would be student support services. While resources are available, they can sometimes feel stretched, especially during peak academic periods, and navigating administrative processes can be challenging. Overall, I would absolutely recommend McGill to anyone looking for a rigorous education in an inspiring, multicultural setting with strong global recognition.
After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
