SKEMA Business School vs University of South Africa - UNISA vs Nelson Mandela University vs North-West University - NWU vs Regenesys Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 1,170 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry relevance and practical skills
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Career opportunities and personal development
- +Flexible distance learning and affordability
- +High academic standards and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Supportive environment and good student experience
- +Welcoming and inclusive environment with strong student support.
- +Balanced student life, including vibrant cultural, sporting, and social initiatives.
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed programs.
- +Excellent education and supportive academic environment
- +Vibrant student life and organized campus experience
- +Beautiful campus aesthetics and comfortable facilities
- +Innovative programs with modern technology and effective module structures
- +Committed faculty with real-world insights and supportive administration
- +Global and inclusive environment fostering personal development and leadership
- +Flexible online programs balancing work and study
- +Supportive lecturers and practical learning experiences
- +Efficient registration and accessible study resources
- +Small class sizes and lecturer support
- +Practical, career-driven coursework with diverse subjects
- +Streamlined application process
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
- -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
- -Technical issues and website glitches hinder access to information.
- -Poor administrative support and confusing module selection processes create frustration.
- -Lack of direct, in-person interaction and guidance for new students is a significant drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues, including delays in prize money and bureaucratic hurdles.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of adequate resources.
- -Perceived lack of support and engagement from lecturers.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unclear selection processes and understaffed courses.
- -Lack of practical experience and industry-linked opportunities for students.
- -Language barriers, particularly the dominance of Afrikaans in lectures and campus life.
- -Lack of clear communication and organization from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging course content.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and lack of support.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and equipment.
- -Limited access to essential resources and learning materials.
- -Administrative and management issues, including a lack of recognition for prior learning.
- -Poor quality of subjects compared to previous learning experiences.
- -Financial and communication problems with the accounts department.
Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with the highest marks awarded for **Value** (4.36), closely followed by **Location** (4.31) and **Internationality** (4.23). Professors and Facilities also received positive feedback, both scoring above 4.1. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.20, with Student Life also being a less strong point at 3.96.
This university demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest score, and strong showings in **Professors** and **Value**. Student life and facilities also rate well. However, **Accomodation** emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, followed by Internationality, indicating areas that could benefit from improvement to further enhance the overall student experience.
This institution garners impressive scores across most evaluated aspects. Value stands out as its strongest area, with a rating of 4.38. Professors and Student Life are also highly regarded, both receiving scores of 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation presents as the weakest area, scoring 3.84, indicating a potential point for improvement compared to other strengths.
Exceptional scores highlight this institution's strengths, particularly in **Location** and **Internationality**, both achieving 4.8. **Accommodations** also received a very high rating of 4.67. Among the surveyed areas, **Student Life** registered the lowest score at 4.25, though it remains a solid rating. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high level of satisfaction across its facilities, professors, and value.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Value (4.64)** and **Location (4.3)**. **Student Life (4.2)** and **Facilities (4.11)** are also rated positively. However, **Accomodation (3.17)** stands out as the weakest area, indicating potential room for improvement in student living arrangements. Other categories like Professors and Internationality also received solid, above average scores.
This university garners notable strengths in its facilities, scoring a high 4.2, and a good location rating of 4.14. Student life and overall value also received positive marks. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.29. Professors and internationality also scored moderately well.
~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With a 4.33 average rating from 456 reviews, ~86% are positive, praising academic standards, detailed materials, and distance learning flexibility. A small ~2.4% of feedback is negative, citing technical issues and navigation difficulties.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 108 reviews, ~92% of feedback is positive, praising vibrant student life, innovative environment, and helpful staff. A single negative review noted slow administration and weak job placements.
Approximately 99.3% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent education, vibrant student life, and helpful support services. A tiny fraction of negative feedback points to a need for more practical experience and occasional language barriers.
With an average rating of 4.6/5, ~80% of reviews are positive. Students praise modern technology, lecturer support, and engaging module structures. No negative feedback was reported.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praised flexible online programs, responsiveness, and practical course content preparation for the workforce.
About 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting small class sizes, supportive lecturers, and practical coursework. A small percentage of feedback, around 7%, mentions issues with recognition of prior learning and administrative processes.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
My experience with the university has been amazing and I thank every lecturer at that university that helped shaped my future. I met great people through out my journey and we're even friends. I would highly recommend the university to anyone.
I liked it's location and how they handled the education system, good engineering faculty, the inclusive vibes, and less protest drama what I disliked is the slow administration, weak job placements,
NWU helps unlock students potentials. I came here as a shy person, in less than 2 years I'm a completely different person . More confidence, I am more focused , more motivated and so much more .it's a worthwhile experience being here .
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The block system that is used at Eduvos, is one that divides the year's content into four quarters, as opposed to semesters - so, the exams are written four times. This makes it a little more strenuous because there is more content to cover in little time and there is hardly enough time to prepare for exams. Most students are already drained by the time they have to write exams because, during the seven weeks of classes they have to write tests and hand-in assignments, this gives them no time to reboot because exams begin on week 8 of every block. However, the workload can be easily tackled with a good study calendar since it is usually 3 modules per block in the first two years of study. So, with the right time-management, good grades can be achieved.
