King's College London vs University College London - UCL vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Goldsmiths University of London - Gold
Side-by-side comparison from 1,147 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Academic excellence and expert professors
- +Diverse international environment and community
- +Strong balance of theory and practical application
- +World-class education and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Amazing central London location and vibrant community
- +Knowledgeable and approachable staff
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Supportive, passionate, and approachable staff.
- +Practical, relevant courses with real-world application.
- +Positive, friendly campus atmosphere and strong sense of community.
- +Intellectually stimulating programmes with an interdisciplinary approach.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable lecturers.
- +Encouragement of critical thinking, independent learning, and creative problem-solving.
- +Engaging and supportive faculty.
- +Practical, real-world focused curriculum.
- +Vibrant campus life and location.
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inconvenience.
- -The high cost of tuition, especially for international students, is not justified by the provided value.
- -Administrative and enrollment issues are a significant problem.
- -Lack of accessibility and problems with academic record keeping are prevalent.
- -Over-enrolled courses and insufficient practical instruction are common complaints.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
- -Disorganized administration and teaching with frequent strikes.
- -Biased teaching lacking diverse perspectives.
- -Unfair grading and lack of timely feedback.
- -Administrative & management issues, including a lack of student support and disorganization.
- -Inexperienced teachers and professors who seem uncaring about student progress.
- -Lack of resources and scattered course structure negatively impact learning.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
This university receives its highest marks for Location, scoring an impressive 4.81. Internationality also scores very well at 4.63. Areas performing less strongly include Accomodation, with a rating of 3.55, and Value, which sits just under 4.0. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Student Life fall within a solid mid-range.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its **Location** (4.64) and **Internationality** (4.62). Its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** also received strong scores, all above 4.2. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Accomodation**, which scored the lowest at 3.71, though **Value** also presented a moderate rating of 4.15.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
This university demonstrates a strong performance across most surveyed aspects, with professors, internationality, location, and facilities all receiving high marks, averaging above 4.2. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a notably lower rating.
With exceptional ratings in Internationality and Professors, this university demonstrates significant strengths in its global outlook and faculty expertise. Its facilities and location also received favorable scores. However, accommodation appears to be the area with the lowest student satisfaction. Student life and value for money are also rated moderately well, suggesting a generally positive, though not perfect, experience.
Internationality stands out as the highest-rated aspect, reflecting a strong global presence. Facilities and professors also received commendable scores. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student life and value for money fall within a moderate range, with location also performing well but not reaching the highest tiers.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 240 reviews, ~99.6% are positive. Students praise academic excellence, stimulating international environments, and supportive professors. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
Over 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding education, a diverse international community, and an amazing London location. A small percentage of feedback mentions administrative issues and accessibility concerns.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
With ~89% positive reviews and an average 4.25/5 rating, students highlight a friendly campus vibe, engaging events, and supportive, knowledgeable staff. Some mention practical, industry-relevant courses and good group project opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.
Nearly 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting intellectually stimulating programmes, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and a creative learning environment. A small amount of negative feedback notes disorganized departments and occasional strikes.
The vast majority of reviews (~74%) highlight Kingston University's strong learning environment, knowledgeable lecturers, and relevant course content. A small percentage (~2.5%) of feedback mentioned issues with management and resources.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
Versatile degree with many potential teaching pathways and career options. However a degree focused a lot on social studies rather than culture and media. There should be more of a focus on this given the degree title, making it seem a bit misleading.
Anyone attending UCL has objectively worked immensely hard to get here as it demands academic excellence. I began my journey at UCL with almost an air of complacency - that I had already made it. Studying here has dismantled this thought and propelled me to think deeper and more critically than I ever anticipated. My understanding of my degree (Linguistics) was, at first, hyper-focused to a purely sociolinguistic point of view from my English Language A-Level. However, the professors, who are experts in their fields, reframe your thinking to be that of an analytical linguist who questions and critiques every belief you and others have in this field. Oftentimes when I state my degree I get asked the question: “what languages do you speak then?”. One takeaway I hope people discover is that a linguistics degree is so much more than language; it stands at the intersection of computer science, psychology, neuroscience, sociology, and philosophy. The education you receive at UCL stands out to me as holistic, preparing you for a modern, technologically advanced and constantly changing job market.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Nothing to show
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
