King's College London vs University College London - UCL vs Queen Mary University of London - QMUL vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Goldsmiths University of London - Gold
Side-by-side comparison from 1,139 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive professors and academic excellence
- +Vibrant student life and diverse international community
- +Strong balance of theory and practical application
- +World-class education and intellectually stimulating environment
- +Vibrant, diverse, and international community
- +Prime London location and career opportunities
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming community and social opportunities
- +Clear information and good academic structure
- +Practical, relevant, and industry-standard course content
- +Passionate, supportive, and approachable lecturers
- +Diverse, inclusive, and vibrant campus community
- +Intellectually stimulating programmes with an interdisciplinary approach.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable lecturers.
- +Encouragement of critical thinking, independent learning, and creative problem-solving.
- +Knowledgeable and approachable lecturers, practical and relevant course content
- +Inclusive campus environment with many opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Strong support systems and useful resources for students
- +Practical experience through placements and hands-on training
- +Supportive and dedicated lecturers
- +Positive campus environment and community feel
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of investment in them are disappointing.
- -High tuition fees are not perceived as being reflected in the quality of education or resources.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Inadequate accessibility and forgotten paperwork create serious academic and administrative burdens.
- -Overcrowded classes and impractical theoretical teaching hinder learning.
- -Lack of course support and practical industry preparation.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues regarding modules and projects.
- -Disruptions from strikes and lack of compensation for missed learning.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often criticized as being ineffective.
- -Disorganized administration and teaching with frequent strikes.
- -Biased teaching lacking diverse perspectives.
- -Unfair grading and lack of timely feedback.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts studies.
- -Disorganized student union and indifferent faculty are recurring problems.
- -Administrative & management issues are a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and resources is frequently mentioned.
The university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably excelling in Location with a rating of 4.82 and Internationality at 4.62. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, rated at 3.56. Value and Student Life are rated moderately well, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. Student life, professors, and facilities also received strong marks, averaging over 4.2. The primary area for improvement appears to be **Accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.71. The university also received a solid rating for **Value** at over 4.1.
Overall, this university receives positive feedback across most aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, boasting a high rating. The university also performs well in Facilities and Student Life. Areas for potential improvement include Accomodation and Value, which received lower scores compared to other categories.
Surveyed metrics indicate a generally positive university experience. Professors and Internationality received the highest marks, both above 4.2. Facilities and Student Life also scored well, exceeding 4.1. Location and Value were rated respectably around 4.0. The weakest area, Accommodation, scored significantly lower at 3.6.
With exceptional ratings in Internationality and Professors, this university demonstrates significant strengths in its global outlook and faculty expertise. Its facilities and location also received favorable scores. However, accommodation appears to be the area with the lowest student satisfaction. Student life and value for money are also rated moderately well, suggesting a generally positive, though not perfect, experience.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value also received favorable scores. Student Life and Accomodation are areas where improvements could be beneficial, as they received the lowest ratings in the survey.
Professors and facilities are highly regarded at this institution, earning top marks. Student life and location also receive favorable reviews. While generally positive, accommodation and value represent the areas with the lowest scores, indicating potential for improvement. Internationality is rated solidly in the middle.
With ~74% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.16/5, students highlight versatile degrees, supportive professors, and a vibrant international community. A very small amount of feedback noted administrative slowness and a degree focus not matching its title.
~98.9% of reviews are positive, praising outstanding education, smart peers, and London's location. A small ~1.1% of feedback notes administrative errors and accessibility issues.
~77% of 208 reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, welcoming environments, and good opportunities. Minimal negative feedback, ~2%, notes limited support and communication issues.
With a 4.24 average rating from 161 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students praise practical course content, passionate lecturers, and a good campus vibe. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nearly 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting intellectually stimulating programmes, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and a creative learning environment. A small amount of negative feedback notes disorganized departments and occasional strikes.
Kingston University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~81% of 80 reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.19/5. Key strengths include knowledgeable lecturers, practical course content, and a supportive environment, though a small percentage (~2.5%) noted poor management and lack of resources.
With an average rating of 4.49/5, ~91% of 45 reviews are positive. Students praise the holistic, evidence-based nursing practice, valuable clinical placements, and supportive environment. Some mention inconsistent mentor support and slow administration.
Versatile degree with many potential teaching pathways and career options. However a degree focused a lot on social studies rather than culture and media. There should be more of a focus on this given the degree title, making it seem a bit misleading.
I like our school very much, because the school provides many club activities, psychological counseling and career experience activities every week, as well as free paper tutorials and resume revision services, which have laid a good foundation for my future development outside the campus. However, due to the heavy pressure of school work, I have limited time to participate in these activities. Maybe the school can carry out some seminars or courses to help us better balance study and various activities. In general, I highly recommend our school, it is a good place to study.
While the first year was full of compulsory modules and slightly overwhelming, I have really enjoyed the last two years. They have allowed me to explore what I am genuinely interested in (specifically human rights) by offering such a wide range of modules. This is what I have enjoyed most out of the course. There was a long directory of modules to choose from in the last two years, all with different types of assignments (either entirely exam-based, entirely coursework or a mixture of the two). As I picked mostly human-rights based modules and such, I have realised that I want to work in this field too, and am also preparing to apply to a masters in this field within the next two years. However, some of the module assignments changed after registration in the third year, and this caused some problems in the last semester when students tried to change modules, as each module change is done manually in the Politics department. I know that some students, including myself, were unhappy with this experience when modules filled up too quickly. Student support has been amazing. Lecturers and professors have been very helpful with assignment-support. The help has ranged from office hours to telephone calls and emails. In my second and third year, I have found this particularly helpful in pushing my grade higher as lecturers are always open to looking over essay and assignment plans and offering helpful advice. One small problem that I encountered with this in the third year was that marking criteria was inconsistent with some modules and lecturers. However, this was only limited to one or two modules, and overall, I was happy with my experience. Career support is also very good. I only started using the resources available from the careers office this year, but it has been a good experience. Meetings are available every week and I have used them to get my cover letter checked as well as having a mock interview for an internship. This really helped me to prepare for possible questions as it was my first interview. I would definitely recommend this course and university to a friend. I have enjoyed my time and know what I want to do in the future career-wise.
most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )
Nothing to show
The course and it's syllabus can be super interesting and fun but most of the lecturers are trash. They show no enthusiasm to teach and deliver lectures as if they were eulogies. Which is a shame, I feel the only thing holding back KU is the lack of enthusiasm.
Nothing to show
