SKEMA Business School vs Bethune-Cookman University vs University of Massachusetts Amherst - UMass Amherst vs Amherst College vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 212 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International environment and diverse student community
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world business application
- +Extensive international exposure and global campus options
- +Diverse student body and community
- +Academic rigor and engaging faculty
- +Rich internship and research opportunities
- +Abundant research and internship opportunities.
- +Excellent campus facilities and beautiful surroundings.
- +Vibrant student life and engaging academic programs.
- +Excellent academics and supportive professors.
- +Generous financial aid and diverse student body.
- +Liberal arts focus with flexible course options.
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
- +High-quality, in-demand skills taught by experts
- +Career-focused outcomes, especially remote tech jobs
- +Exceptional free and paid course content
- +Strong, respected, and comprehensive business programs
- +Supportive community and challenging environment
- +Well-equipped and accessible facilities
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication, exam, and results management.
- -Concerns about teaching faculty and a perception of education being treated as a business.
- -Lack of student guidance and support for career goals.
- -Administrative & management issues often cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently cited.
- -Poor communication and lack of clarity create confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and communication is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiency
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum relevance
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources for learning.
- -Inflexible academic policies and unresponsive faculty.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Strengths lie in **Internationality**, rated highest at 4.44, followed closely by **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.33). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.25) also received strong scores. The primary area for improvement is **Accomodation**, with the lowest rating of 3.70. **Value** sits at a respectable 4.10.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, accommodation, and internationality, all scoring 4.5 out of 5. Student life and location are also well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. The university offers good value for money, also rated at 4. While no areas are significantly low, the location and student life are comparatively the least strong, though still very positive.
This institution garners strong commendations across several key areas. Student life stands out as its most highly rated aspect, closely followed by accommodation and value. However, facilities and internationality received the lowest scores among the surveyed categories, indicating these might be areas for development. The university also performs well in its professor quality and location.
The university receives outstanding marks in several key areas. Notably, it excels with perfect scores for accommodation, professors, and internationality, along with a near-perfect rating for facilities and student life. Its location is its relatively weakest point, though still rated highly at 4. Value for money also stands out with a perfect score.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5. The sole area of concern is accommodation, which received a score of 0. This indicates a significant disconnect in housing provisions compared to other strengths.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its professor quality and value, both achieving a perfect 5. Facilities and location also receive very high marks at 4.75. While student life and accommodation are strong at 4.5, the university's internationality, rated at 4.25, is its comparatively lowest performing area, though still a solid score.
With a 4.37 average rating from 179 reviews, approximately 90% are positive, highlighting a rewarding and transformative experience with academic knowledge, practical learning, and international exposure. A small percentage (~2.2%) of negative feedback cited management issues and poor communication.
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback indicates approximately 100% positive sentiment. Students highlighted diversity, research opportunities, internships, and a close-knit academic community as key strengths.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 9 reviews, approximately 89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight research opportunities, campus life, and dining options. There are no negative reviews.
With two out of two reviews being positive, students praise the phenomenal academics, excellent professors, and generous financial aid. The liberal arts education is described as well-rounded and rewarding.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This ~100% positive feedback highlights exceptional course content and the acquisition of in-demand digital skills beneficial for securing tech jobs.
All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight transformative experiences, a supportive environment, and exciting, challenging curricula. No negative feedback was recorded.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
