SKEMA Business School vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs University of Nevada, Las Vegas - UNLV vs Chamberlain University vs Schiller International University
Side-by-side comparison from 192 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Strong programs in specialized fields like medical and hospitality.
- +Helpful and kind professors offering extra support.
- +Positive campus environment with good amenities and opportunities.
- +Outstanding academic programs and excellent, attentive faculty
- +Pleasant campus and welcoming environment
- +Practical, relevant curriculum for future careers
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Strong, respected, and comprehensive business programs
- +Supportive community and challenging environment
- +Well-equipped and accessible facilities
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and poor communication from staff are prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution garners impressive scores across the board, with **Student Life** and **Accomodation** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a perfect 4.5. **Value** also scores exceptionally high at 4.75. The **Professors** category, while still good, is the lowest rated at 4.0, indicating it's the area with the most room for improvement.
This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in its **professors and location**, both rated at an impressive 4.33. Areas such as facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received solid ratings of 4, indicating a generally positive experience across these aspects. While no single category falls significantly short, the professors and location stand out as key strengths.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This institution garners exceptional scores, particularly excelling in its professor quality and value, both achieving a perfect 5. Facilities and location also receive very high marks at 4.75. While student life and accommodation are strong at 4.5, the university's internationality, rated at 4.25, is its comparatively lowest performing area, though still a solid score.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
All four reviews are positive, averaging 4.5/5 stars. Students appreciate the campus, resources, and opportunities, with many highlighting helpful professors and strong programs, particularly in hospitality and medicine.
All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4/5. Students praise the academic programs, faculty attention, and the campus environment as beneficial and attractive for learning.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
All 4 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5. Students highlight transformative experiences, a supportive environment, and exciting, challenging curricula. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
