EU Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs UIC Barcelona vs SKEMA Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 468 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S (4.50)
EU Business School: wins 2/7 categories
Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/7 categories
UIC Barcelona: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
C3S Business School in Barcelona - C3S: wins 3/7 categories
The College of New Jersey - TCNJ: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Barcelona, Spain
3.80
Read more reviews
234 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Barcelona, Spain
4.20
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: University Bachelor’s Degree in Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: BA Hons in Business Management (Level 4
Ewing, New Jersey, United States
3.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.17
3.68
4.09
4.21
Win
4.03
3.09
Location
4.70
Win
4.00
3.63
3.90
4.25
4.42
2.36
Professors
4.03
4.00
3.82
4.27
4.41
4.59
Win
3.73
Internationality
4.70
Win
3.83
3.30
3.82
4.36
4.54
3.45
Student life
4.22
4.17
3.59
3.82
4.11
4.30
Win
3.10
Value
3.87
4.17
3.59
3.91
4.04
4.36
Win
4.00
Accommodation
3.47
4.60
Win
3.16
3.33
3.58
3.66
3.18
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse international environment and networking opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with practical insights
  • +Innovative and engaging business programs
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Modern facilities and resources
  • +Academic excellence and innovative methodology
  • +Practical, real-world skills training
  • +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable, kind professors.
  • +Supportive and collaborative student atmosphere.
  • +Strong preparation for career success and international outlook.
  • +Strong academic programmes with practical application
  • +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
  • +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable faculty providing strong support for career readiness.
  • +Diverse and welcoming multicultural environment fostering collaboration and soft skills.
  • +Accessible instructors and helpful staff dedicated to student success and growth.
  • +Exceptional and supportive professors
  • +Strong preparation for careers and graduate school
  • +Vibrant student life and diverse community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -The quality of education and teaching is often perceived as basic and unengaging.
  • -Facilities and academic support are frequently criticized as inadequate.
  • -Poor management and unqualified staff.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Lack of administrative support and disorganization.
  • -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
  • -Poor organization and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Lack of support and indifferent attitude from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
  • -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of support for internships and career services is a recurring complaint.
  • -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and unaddressed student grievances are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clear expectations create confusion.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received positive marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, indicating room for improvement. **Professors** and **Value** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

This university garners strong approval, particularly for its **accommodation**, which achieved the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well. Conversely, **internationality** received the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects. Professors, location, and value for money are all rated at a solid 4 out of 5.

This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.

The university demonstrates particular strengths in its academic offerings, with **Professors** receiving a high rating of 4.27. **Facilities** are also well-regarded at 4.09. Areas for improvement are evident in **Accomodation**, which scored lowest at 3.33. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately.

This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.

This institution garners significant praise, particularly for its professors, internationality, and location, all receiving scores above 4.4. Student life and value also score highly. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a considerably lower rating. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, though improvements could be made in its housing provisions.

Overall, this university receives a strong rating for value, standing out as its highest-scoring aspect. Professors are also well-regarded. Conversely, the location received the lowest marks among the surveyed categories, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like facilities, student life, accommodation, and internationality fall within a moderate to good range of satisfaction.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse networks, knowledgeable professors, and an engaging international environment. A small percentage of feedback (~7.7%) notes disorganization and basic education.

Most reviews praise the academic environment, dedicated professors, and supportive staff. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with a specific director and teacher hiring practices.

Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.

With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 86% of reviews are positive, praising the collaborative atmosphere, quality programs, and accessible location. One review (around 7%) cites issues with indifferent administration.

Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.

With a 4.54 average rating, ~95% of reviews are positive, praising enthusiastic faculty, a diverse and supportive environment, and strong career preparation. A small minority (~5%) express dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.

With an average rating of 3.45/5 from 11 reviews, most feedback is positive (~100%). Recurring positive themes include supportive professors and good preparation for careers, though some note limited surrounding town culture and outdated teaching methods.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
71%
21%
50%
49%
69%
9%
4★
46%
0%
46%
36%
42%
23%
27%
3★
21%
14%
25%
7%
7%
3%
64%
2★
4%
0%
4%
0%
1%
3%
0%
1★
4%
14%
4%
7%
1%
3%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Professor and teaching style

Although I earned my bachelor degree at the University of York in UK, it was quite theoretical. I really started to bridge the learning gap between theory and practice only when I started to pursue my master degree in Business Analytics and Data Science at EU Business School in Barcelona. What stands out most in my current program is the university’s strong emphasis on practical experience. Our professors are not only scholars but also are successful business managers and data experts, as they are either the owners of successful organizations or individuals who took on top management roles in large corporations. Their teachings are more than just the syllabus in, they also provide personal experience in the area of niche markets, provide best practices in an industry, and always provoke our thinking with regard to the existing trends in higher education, business strategy, and innovation.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

ADE Course

Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Supportive Environment, Faculty and Academics

C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close