University of Leicester vs De Montfort University - DMU vs University of Loughborough vs Eaton Business School vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 263 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Engaging and flexible academic programs
- +Welcoming and diverse student community
- +Engaging and passionate lecturers
- +Strong academic quality and learning experiences
- +Excellent facilities and community environment
- +Strong academic programs with real-world relevance and expert faculty
- +Vibrant campus life with diverse and collaborative community
- +Excellent enterprise support and focus on innovation
Nothing to show
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient exam formats and time constraints.
- -Ineffective teaching and poor feedback processes.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Substandard facilities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are prevalent concerns.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates particular strengths in student life, with a rating of 4.375, and location, scoring 4.319. Internationality also performs well, at 4.307. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score at 3.75, suggesting it is the weakest area. Facilities and professors also received solid scores above 4.0. Value for money is also rated positively at 4.08.
With strong performance in **location** (4.34) and **student life** (4.33), this university garners high marks in several key areas. Facilities (4.32) and internationality (4.29) also received favorable scores. The university's **professors** represent its lowest-rated category at 4.07, though accommodation and value scored similarly at 4.12.
Overall, the university scores well across multiple categories. Its strongest area is **Facilities**, boasting an impressive 4.69 average. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, both exceeding 4.3. The lowest-rated aspect is **Location** at 4.0, while other areas like Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality remain solid with scores above 4.2.
Nothing to show
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.24/5 from 80 reviews, ~82.5% are positive. Students praise a friendly, student-focused environment with effective communication, cost-friendliness, and safety. A small ~1.3% of feedback mentioned issues with exam timing.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising academic quality, passionate professors, and excellent facilities. A small percentage (3%) of negative feedback mentioned issues with foundation year credits and unsupportive teaching staff.
With a ~95% positive sentiment, reviews highlight diverse courses, work experience opportunities, and a vibrant campus. Students appreciate the supportive, collaborative atmosphere and lack of a strong drinking culture. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Regrettably, I cannot offer a recommendation for Comic and Concept art due to the following reasons: Firstly, the accessibility of the teachers proved to be quite challenging as they were unresponsive to multiple email attempts throughout the entire year. Moreover, the feedback provided was often overly vague and lacked constructive criticism, occasionally even being unnecessarily harsh. In some instances, no feedback was given at all. Submitting work was frequently an arduous task, as specific file formats were required that were incompatible with the content, such as demanding PDFs for documents that couldn't be formatted accordingly and were subsequently rejected. Furthermore, the lessons themselves were lacking in quality. Some lecturers would digress into unrelated topics, consuming valuable class time. The teaching approach was disappointingly minimal, with students being assigned tasks without any guidance or instructional techniques provided. If feedback was given, it was generally unhelpfully brief, merely stating that improvements were needed. The learning materials provided during the lessons were also subpar. Often, we were presented with pre-recorded 10-minute videos and expected to navigate our own way through the material. This lack of effort on the part of the lecturers was unfair and disheartening, making it challenging for students to invest their own efforts. The workload imposed on students was excessive and overwhelming, leading to the majority falling behind. Consequently, many students experienced a negative impact on their mental well-being, ultimately resulting in some dropping out. Additionally, the university failed to provide necessary information about the course, leaving students to rely on each other for essential details. Timetables and key information, including student cards, were significantly delayed without any valid explanation. Technological tools such as email, Blackboard, Teams, and attendance systems frequently malfunctioned, causing further frustration and hindrance to the learning experience. Tragically, instances of bullying were pervasive both within the classroom and online, including incidents targeting vulnerable individuals. Despite reporting these matters to the course leader, no action could be taken without the full names of the involved students, which was a requirement I couldn't fulfill. Regrettably, when I brought these concerns to the attention of the class representatives, they chose to ignore my pleas for assistance. Lastly, living in Leicester City proved to be unsafe, with prevalent cases of sexual harassment, homophobic and transphobic threats. Disturbingly, both the police and the university failed to take any meaningful action in response to these issues.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show