University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs Simon Business School vs University of Rochester vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT vs St. John Fisher College
Side-by-side comparison from 149 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +International, American-style education with small, discussion-based classes
- +Practical, real-world learning from experienced, accessible professors
- +Supportive and engaging environment that encourages critical thinking
Nothing to show
- +Strong academic programs with knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and friendly student community and social opportunities
- +Ample student resources and support systems
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
- +Strong sense of community and personal professor attention
- +High-quality educational programs
- +Vibrant campus atmosphere and entertainment
- +Strong community and supportive teachers.
- +Modern campus and facilities.
- +Abundant extracurricular activities and personal development opportunities.
- +Experiential learning and practical application of business concepts
- +High-quality instruction and direct industry leader engagement
- +International exposure and strong peer networking opportunities
- -Overpriced tuition and fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Unresponsive administration and management.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of essential resources hinders learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
The university garners strong scores across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as exceptionally high at 4.90. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also received very positive feedback. **Accomodation** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.95, while **Facilities** and **Value** are rated well but not as high as other categories. Professors and overall value are also rated favorably.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest suit at 4.56. **Student Life** and **Professors** also receive high praise, both scoring 3.89. **Value** is another strong point, rated at 4.11. In contrast, **Location** emerges as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 2.89. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately well, at 3.78.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities, professors, and value, all receiving a high 4.5 rating. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas with lower scores, both rated at 3. Location and accommodation sit in the middle range at 3.5. Overall, the university offers a strong academic and resource foundation, though social and international engagement could be enhanced.
Professors stand out with an impressive rating, reflecting a particular strength in academic instruction. The university also scores highly in location and value. Accommodation presents the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement compared to other aspects of the student experience. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid, well-rounded performance.
This institution garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in Student Life with a perfect score. Facilities, Location, and Accomodation are also strong, all receiving 4.5 ratings. Professors and Value are rated highly at 4.67. The lowest score, though still solid, is for Internationality at 4.33.
All 50 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.68/5. Students praise the international environment, smaller classes, and professors' practical industry experience. Discussions and critical thinking are highlighted strengths.
Nothing to show
With a 4.22/5 average rating, ~89% of reviews are positive, praising professors' knowledge, research evidence, diverse student body, and campus resources. A small amount of feedback noted issues with uncommunicative advisors.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university is highly regarded, with a 4.5/5 average rating. Students praise its tight-knit community, personalized professor attention, and high-quality education, especially within its pharmacy program. There's a strong emphasis on community service.
With a 4.8/5 average rating from 45 reviews, students praise the strong sense of community, wonderful professors, and modern, welcoming campus. There are no reported negative experiences.
With an average rating of 4.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight hands-on learning, business idea development, and valuable connections with industry leaders and peers as significant benefits. Minimal negative feedback was present.
I studied at UNYP and overall had a very positive experience. What I appreciated most was the international environment, smaller classes, and the chance to interact directly with professors instead of feeling like just another student in a huge lecture hall. The university has a practical, English-speaking atmosphere, and it is a good fit for students who want an American-style education in the center of Prague. I also liked that many classes encouraged discussion, presentations, and real examples rather than only theory. Of course, like at any university, some administrative processes can take time and the experience may depend on the program and professors you choose. But from a student perspective, UNYP gave me useful academic experience, international connections, and a lot of personal growth. I would recommend it to students who want a smaller, international university environment in Prague and are ready to be active in their studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Great sense of community, once you find the right people. The professors are wonderful, especially Dr. Hurtová and Dr. Tomášková. The entire university recently had a massive facelift, so the whole institution feels modern and welcoming.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
