SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 200 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/6 categories
International School of Management: wins 3/6 categories
Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo - UFES: wins 1/6 categories
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS: wins 0/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Centro Universitário Facol - FACOL: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Best programme: Acting
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Best programme: Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.64
3.67
3.58
4.40
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.25
4.64
4.67
4.11
4.70
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.41
4.82
Win
4.33
4.31
4.60
3.00
4.00
Internationality
4.39
4.82
Win
3.00
3.41
4.60
3.00
2.00
Student life
4.14
4.50
4.33
4.03
3.90
5.00
Win
4.00
Value
4.06
4.73
5.00
Win
4.28
3.90
3.00
4.00
Accommodation
3.59
4.64
Win
2.67
3.04
3.00
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and practical, engaging courses
  • +Diverse international environment and strong friendships
  • +Extensive clubs, activities, and career development opportunities
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +Good professors and STEM labs
  • +Affordable food options
  • +Free education
  • +Experienced professors with practical application
  • +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
  • +Quality education meeting student expectations
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format
  • +Excellent professors and good classes
  • +Valuable academic programs with new course additions
  • +Desire for more practical learning experiences
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
  • -Poor communication and guidance hinder academic and career progression.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and educational quality.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Course content is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly for its **Professors** (4.41) and **Internationality** (4.39). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Location** (4.25) also receive strong scores. **Student Life** (4.14) and **Value** (4.06) are rated favorably. The **Accomodation** (3.59) stands out as the lowest-rated aspect, though still a moderate score.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. The location and student life both receive outstanding marks, complemented by a perfect score for value. Professors are also highly regarded, contributing to a positive academic experience. However, accommodation presents a notable weakness, with a significantly lower rating. Facilities are rated moderately, and internationality falls within an average range.

This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly excelling in its **Location**, earning a perfect score. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations all receive commendable ratings of 4, indicating solid performance in these key areas. However, a notable area for improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a rating of 2. Overall, the university offers good value, reflected in its 4-star rating for that aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.36 average rating, ~97.3% of reviews are positive, praising interactive classes, supportive faculty, and diverse international experiences. The remaining ~2.7% express concerns about management, communication, and program organization.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight good professors and labs, as well as affordable food options. Some infrastructure and course content could be improved.

Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, student feedback is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlighted excellent professors and good classes, with a minor suggestion for more practical studies.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
64%
0%
43%
60%
50%
0%
4★
42%
36%
100%
50%
40%
0%
100%
3★
6%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close