London Metropolitan University vs University of York vs York St John University vs The York Management School vs York Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 193 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive mentors and approachable, knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and wide range of course options.
- +Career-focused programs with an emphasis on practical learning and employability.
- +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +Strong sense of community and student support
- +Varied and well-supported academic programs
- +Small class sizes and detailed teaching
- +Wide range of courses and specialist staff
- +Strong student support and engaging activities
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
- -Poor course structure and lack of preparation for the workforce.
- -Subpar facilities and unresponsive program office.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff.
- -Poor course quality and academic support.
- -Significant organizational and administrative issues.
- -Negative student experiences with staff and the overall environment.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are commonly criticized.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fail to meet student expectations.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not uniformly outstanding experience.
The university garners strong ratings across multiple areas, with **Location** standing out as its highest-rated aspect. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also received excellent scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, with a rating notably lower than other categories. **Value** and **Internationality** fall within a moderate range, while **Professors** are also well-regarded.
Exceptionally high ratings characterize this university's offerings. The facilities stand out with an impressive score of 4.53, representing its strongest area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating at 4.03. Other areas like professors, student life, internationality, and value all show solid scores above 4.2, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple facets of university life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty, diverse environments, and career-focused programs. A small percentage (around 7%) express dissatisfaction with teaching quality, course structure, or facilities.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 65 reviews, ~88% of feedback is positive, praising welcoming community, engaging courses, and supportive instructors. A small ~3% of reviews mention disorganization and poor lecturer responsiveness.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.19/5, students highlight excellent teaching and small class sizes. They appreciate ample extracurriculars and good student support.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
York Law School offers a very unique course which contrasts that to every in the country. The experience I have gathered from having interviews and negotiations as an active part of my course is particularly notable. Moreover, the study space is new and well-furnished. It is comfortable and perfect for get togethers with other students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
