Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Tallinn University - TLU vs Tallinn University of Technology - TalTech vs Estonian Business School - EBS
Side-by-side comparison from 88 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
- +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
- +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
- +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
- +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
- +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
- +Organized and diverse study themes, including e-studies
- +Central location and modern campus facilities
- +Focus on social and humanitarian sciences
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with collaborative opportunities
- +Skilled teachers and helpful staff
- +Diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Comprehensive and practical business programs
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +High-quality education with practical skills focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with good remote options and activities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant concern.
- -Insufficient resources and poor learning curve hinder academic success.
- -Rising tuition fees without commensurate value are a major point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The teaching quality and curriculum are often criticized for being uninspiring or irrelevant.
With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.
This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. It excels in **Location**, scoring a notable 4.27, and **Professors** are also highly rated at 4.23. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are solid at 3.4 and 3.47 respectively, with **Value** also performing reasonably at 3.53. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3.83. The most significant area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score of 2.33.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and location, both scoring very highly. Student life, professors, internationality, and value also receive positive marks. The weakest area, though still rated well, is accommodation. Overall, the institution offers a robust environment with notable advantages in its physical and geographical aspects.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Outstanding marks were received for its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. The university also excels in **internationality**, earning a strong 4.5. Areas showing moderate strength include **professors**, **accommodation**, and **value**, all receiving 3.5. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** were rated as the weakest points, both at 3.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors receive a near-perfect score of 4.75, with facilities, location, and student life also scoring highly at 4.25 and 4.5 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3. Internationality also presents an opportunity for growth at 3.75, while the overall value is rated a solid 4.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.
All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.
With an average rating of 3.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~100%). Students highlight the university's organized study themes, distance learning options, and central, modern campus. Some suggest improvements in bureaucracy and flexibility.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 10 reviews, approximately 90% are highly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-focused courses, career and academic opportunities, and skilled, helpful staff. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight the university's offerings, while negative reviews cite high costs and insufficient learning resources.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality education, practical skills, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and engaging activities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
I am an international master's student at TalTech. TalTech provides ample of opportunities to thrive oneself. 1) They have laboratories which are equipped with modern equipment. 2) Access to internet 24/7. 3) Various platforms to show your talent. 4) Quality of education is good but sometimes it's hard to understand some professors. There can be several reasons behind it. 1. He doesn't have command of that subject. 2. He is having language issues. 3. He is knowledgeable but not good at explaining.
Nothing to show
I have been here for almost 3 years. I am in my final semester. This university seems good online, but have proven to be very difficult in person. The university is already very expensive, and they keep increasing the amount every year. When it comes to the learning curve, it is very poor. It depends on the course, but generally, they do not provide enough resources to learn what is needed to survive and make it in the professional world. Most lecturers do not let you pass their course just because of class attendance. The only good thing about this university would have to be the people, networks, and friends you make along the way. You can easily bond with them over the same experiences faced while studying at this uni. So if I have to be honest, I would not recommend this university to any student coming here, unless the school improves afterwards.
Nothing to show
