Aalto University vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Tallinn University - TLU vs Tallinn University of Technology - TalTech vs Estonian Business School - EBS
Side-by-side comparison from 86 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Independent learning, flexibility, and practical, hands-on experiences
- +Strong sense of community, readily available support, and active student life
- +Excellent facilities and multidisciplinary, diverse course opportunities
- +Passionate and supportive educators
- +Practical, career-focused, and well-structured programs
- +International and friendly learning environment
- +Organized and diverse study themes, including e-studies
- +Central location and modern campus facilities
- +Focus on social and humanitarian sciences
- +Practical, industry-focused programs with collaborative opportunities
- +Skilled teachers and helpful staff
- +Diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
- +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
- +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities
- +Comprehensive and practical business programs
- +Supportive and engaged faculty
- +Strong industry connections and career opportunities
- +High-quality education with practical skills focus
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Engaging learning environment with good remote options and activities
- -Administrative & management issues disrupt learning.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder progress.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are a consistent complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Lack of communication and support negatively impacts the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.
- -Administrative & management issues are a significant concern.
- -Insufficient resources and poor learning curve hinder academic success.
- -Rising tuition fees without commensurate value are a major point of dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are frequently mentioned.
- -The teaching quality and curriculum are often criticized for being uninspiring or irrelevant.
This institution demonstrates a solid reputation across multiple facets. Areas like Facilities and Student Life received particularly high marks. Internationality and Value also stood out positively. While still strong, Professors were rated slightly lower than other categories. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and appealing environment for students.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving the highest rating. Its Facilities and Internationality are also highly regarded, alongside a strong showing for Value. Conversely, Accomodation is rated slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture, particularly in areas directly related to learning and global engagement.
Overall, the university receives a mixed but generally positive reception. It excels in **Location**, scoring a notable 4.27, and **Professors** are also highly rated at 4.23. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are solid at 3.4 and 3.47 respectively, with **Value** also performing reasonably at 3.53. **Facilities** are rated moderately at 3.83. The most significant area for improvement lies in **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score of 2.33.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its facilities and location, both scoring very highly. Student life, professors, internationality, and value also receive positive marks. The weakest area, though still rated well, is accommodation. Overall, the institution offers a robust environment with notable advantages in its physical and geographical aspects.
This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.
Outstanding marks were received for its prime **location**, scoring a perfect 5. The university also excels in **internationality**, earning a strong 4.5. Areas showing moderate strength include **professors**, **accommodation**, and **value**, all receiving 3.5. Conversely, **facilities** and **student life** were rated as the weakest points, both at 3.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic offerings and student experience. Professors receive a near-perfect score of 4.75, with facilities, location, and student life also scoring highly at 4.25 and 4.5 respectively. The primary area for improvement lies in accommodation, which received a lower rating of 3. Internationality also presents an opportunity for growth at 3.75, while the overall value is rated a solid 4.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92%), with students praising flexible learning, excellent facilities, and active student life. A few reviewers mentioned that courses sometimes lack depth.
With all 25 reviews being positive, students praise supportive and passionate teachers, practical and career-focused programs, and a rewarding academic experience. An average rating of 4.88/5 reflects this strong satisfaction.
With an average rating of 3.75/5 from four reviews, feedback is mostly positive (~100%). Students highlight the university's organized study themes, distance learning options, and central, modern campus. Some suggest improvements in bureaucracy and flexibility.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from 10 reviews, approximately 90% are highly positive. Students highlight practical, industry-focused courses, career and academic opportunities, and skilled, helpful staff. Negative feedback is minimal (~0%).
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight the university's offerings, while negative reviews cite high costs and insufficient learning resources.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise high-quality education, practical skills, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and engaging activities. No negative reviews were submitted.
Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
Nothing to show
I am an international master's student at TalTech. TalTech provides ample of opportunities to thrive oneself. 1) They have laboratories which are equipped with modern equipment. 2) Access to internet 24/7. 3) Various platforms to show your talent. 4) Quality of education is good but sometimes it's hard to understand some professors. There can be several reasons behind it. 1. He doesn't have command of that subject. 2. He is having language issues. 3. He is knowledgeable but not good at explaining.
Nothing to show
I have been here for almost 3 years. I am in my final semester. This university seems good online, but have proven to be very difficult in person. The university is already very expensive, and they keep increasing the amount every year. When it comes to the learning curve, it is very poor. It depends on the course, but generally, they do not provide enough resources to learn what is needed to survive and make it in the professional world. Most lecturers do not let you pass their course just because of class attendance. The only good thing about this university would have to be the people, networks, and friends you make along the way. You can easily bond with them over the same experiences faced while studying at this uni. So if I have to be honest, I would not recommend this university to any student coming here, unless the school improves afterwards.
Nothing to show
